Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Research Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-05-12, 11:34
Sue from Southend's Avatar
Sue from Southend Sue from Southend is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,309
Default Will question

I have just downloaded a Will from TNA dated 1742. It's of John Charpentier. He makes bequests to his wife, father (if still living) and his unnamed brothers and sisters. He then goes on to appoint his brother Peter and a Mr Ragnoneau (possibly!) as executors. There is then a note dated 1769 appointing Jonathan Charpentier as the "lawful Attorney of Charles Ragnoneau, the surviving executor .... now residing in Beverley, Yorkshire"

My question is - Would Jonathan Charpentier have to be a "proper" attorney or could he just be another of John Charpentier's brothers or sons? Was the term Attorney just being used as "representative"? And any idea about the 27year wait?

I hope this makes sense!
__________________
Sue
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-05-12, 12:01
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,690
Default

Most people don't make wills unless they forsee the possibility of dying and the wrong people getting their hands on the loot. This sort of action is usually prompted by a final illness, but could also be because of a family death or a voyage overseas. Most people if they know they are going to die will amend any pre-existing wills.

I have an instance where a will is discovered and proved (conveniently restoring any surviving property to the bosom of his family) when, had the testator not been a ne'er do well, it should patently have gone to his widow & sons.
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-05-12, 12:07
Olde Crone Olde Crone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,892
Default

For once, I disagree with Phoenix!

I made my Will 22 years ago and have seen no need to change it since. I am hoping it will be considerably older than 27 years when I finally take my leave of you all!

OC
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-05-12, 12:29
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,690
Default

Ahem, I suspect that all your children were born at that date, OC, and that your will is sufficiently well made to cover most eventualities. Most wills pre 1858 were made by men, who could have worked their way through innumerable spouses. I found one that baffled me, until I realised that the 70+ testator had remarried, and forty years separated his eldest and youngest children.
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-05-12, 12:55
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,327
Default

The first meaning given in Chambers dictionary for attorney is "a person legally authorized to act for another" so I think it is probably being used in that sense, i.e. he had been granted "power of attorney" rather than actually being professionally qualified as a lawyer.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 21st May
Lancashire Non-conformist records new on Ancestry
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-05-12, 13:10
Sue from Southend's Avatar
Sue from Southend Sue from Southend is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,309
Default

Thanks Kate - that's what I thought, I just wanted someone to agree with me! Now to try and work out the relationship.....
__________________
Sue
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:35.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.