Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Family History General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 18-12-22, 21:40
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,651
Default Things designed to confuse us

In 1848, Martha Godden, spinster, daughter of John Godden, married James Bowers, son of Thomas, mariner.
In 1876 Martha Bowers, widow, daughter of John Godden, married James Bowers, widower, son of Peter, blacksmith.

In 1862 James Bowers beer house keeper, son of Peter married Martha Hines.

All took place in Alverstoke, Hants. Two women, two men. But imagine attributing the children to the correct father if this were a century earlier!
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18-12-22, 22:11
ElizabethHerts ElizabethHerts is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 9,293
Default

What a muddle, Phoenix.

Godden in some cases morphed into Godwin (if it wasn't Godwin already, but pronounced Godden!). We have this in my son-in-law's tree.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 18-12-22, 22:13
Olde Crone Olde Crone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,823
Default

I have something similar, which means I will never be able to go further back than my 3 x ggm, Jane Holden. Two Jane Holdens, one born 1799, one born 1800, both have parents called James and Margaret Holden, both men are farmers. Two couples definitely, two marriages. Umpteen children all with repeating names, all born just far enough apart to belong to either couple. No wills. 1841 doesn't help either - one James and Margaret couple do have a Jane Holden with them.......AGE UNKNOWN - the fools.

OC
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-12-22, 07:42
Merry's Avatar
Merry Merry is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Christchurch, Dorset
Posts: 21,311
Default

I don't have anything as confusing as that, where the names are the same, but I do have this (sorry, I've posted this before!):

Robert Lewis Packer, the second husband of Mary Bush nee Crawley (mother of Mary Ann Bush) is the brother of Hephzibah Packer, who, at her second marriage became the second wife of James Beard, the father of John Beard (by his first wife), who in turn was the second husband of Mary Ann Bush. Mary Ann was Robert Lewis Packer's stepdaughter and her first husband was Robert William Cotton, son of William Cotton (brushmaker) and Emma Packer. William Cotton and Emma Packer named their second son John Hazel Cotton , so it is probable that Emma was related to Hephzibah, as Hephzibah's father was named Robert Hazel Packer. I believe Robert Lewis Packer, Hephzibah Packer and Emma Priscilla Packer were siblings (or half siblings), the children of Robert Hazel Packer.

It took me maybe ten/fifteen years to remove 'I believe' and 'or half-siblings' from the last sentence when I finally fully proved the rest of it!
__________________
Merry

"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:02.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.