Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Family History General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-07-21, 11:21
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,617
Default Grievous mistakes

Making contact with a DNA match, I went back to my offline tree.

How glad I am that:


  1. It is offline
  2. Individuals are assigned unique identifying numbers
Whenever I put the information into the tree (probably on PAF and twenty odd years ago) I managed to conflate a man and his nephew. Or possibly when I merged two trees a few years back



This is down (I excuse myself!) with two individuals having the same year of burial, and no baptism in the expected parish.



Go on, admit your own folly, please! I begin to feel I should go through each ancestor now, as this is unlikely to be the only mistake.


I won't be so smug about Ancestry trees in future!
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-07-21, 11:43
Olde Crone Olde Crone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,768
Default

Assumption has always been my downfall.

My father spent a lot of time with his maternal grandmother and talked fondly of her. I entered her into my tree and spent many years and much ££££ tracing her family back 200 years - this was pre internet of course. Finally I constructed my internet tree and tidying up loose ends, was horrified to discover she was a late second wife to my great grandfather and no blood relative at all. 200 years worth of research gone to pot.

Another occasion which makes me burn with embarrassment is a comment I left on someone's ancestry tree about him having the wrong wife for someone. No he didn't have the wrong wife, I did, caught in my usual trap of parallel families.

OC
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-07-21, 11:57
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,617
Default

Probably my worst mistake, which completely destroyed my credibility with my correspondent (how was I to know, in those early internet days that two men with the same unusual name were independently living in the same RD) was telling him that his grandfather had a bigamous family
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-07-21, 12:50
Margaret in Burton's Avatar
Margaret in Burton Margaret in Burton is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Burton upon Trent, Staffordshire
Posts: 5,153
Default

Not getting a marriage certificate because funds were tight about 30 years ago. Two families of the same surname in one small Staffordshire village. Both had a daughter Hannah of the right age. Plumped for one, yes guesswork, and OH went off to Stafford record office and researched the birth, marriage and deaths for this family in another part of Staffordshire. Can’t remember off hand where they came from. Many many years later I eventually bought that marriage certificate and I’d picked the wrong Hannah. The two families weren’t even related. This was 200 years of research wasted.

Then of course there is the elusive Peter Henry Harrison who on his marriage certificate says his fathers name is Thomas. Everyone reckons he was a Yorkshire man so the only Peter with a father Thomas was born in York. I researched the family, bought loads of certificates and traced them back to Ireland. OH made many trips to York. Then came the 1911 census and THAT Peter Harrison was still in York and ours in Ashby de la Zouch. More wasted time AND money.
__________________
Marg
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-07-21, 16:13
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,617
Default

I have just found a tree where a woman who appears to have died pre 1841 has allegedly gone back to her maiden name and survived at least 17 more years (well actually long enough to squeeze herself into a dress of a style popular some twenty years after that!)

And Ancestry doesn't recognise her birthplace as being in Hampshire, so they have shown it as Berkshire.

Feel better about myself now
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-07-21, 19:06
Ann from Sussex's Avatar
Ann from Sussex Ann from Sussex is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,380
Default

My biggest mistake was researching the wrong Lenhart family for several years, thinking they MUST be my grandfather's family because of the unusual name although there was no birth record for him and he never appeared on any census with them. Apart from the name I did have the excuse that the family story was that his family had a shop in London and these people had a tobacconist and confectionary shop in Tottenham. I now know they were nothing to do with my family who were actually Americans from New York but I didn't find that out until after I had bought lots of certificates and compiled quite an extensive file of information for the wrong family. I still have it.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-07-21, 02:05
Pinefamily Pinefamily is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: South Australia
Posts: 101
Default

I started a thread recently about finding an ancestor, and tracing her family through several generations, only to find her burial as a young child. Not totally my fault as FMP had indexed the different spelling of her surname in the burial differently to her birth surname spelling. Still a rookie mistake I should have known better not to make.
Like you OC, I have traced my Swedish great grandfather's lineage back to the 1600's, only to find there may be some doubt whether he is actually the father of my grandmother. Currently waiting on the results of DNA testing.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-07-21, 02:19
marquette's Avatar
marquette marquette is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,251
Default

For a time, I followed someone else's research and had Thomas Collis born in Wokingham who married a woman from Ruscombe and they settled at Hurst St Nicholas. He had a brother called Farmborough Collis who was left nothing in their father's Will for his continued wicked ways - I think I rather liked Farmborough!

It bothered me though, why Thomas was buried in Sparsholt Hampshire, for no apparent reason. So much so that I trawled through the records of Sparsholt and found a baptism there for another Thomas Collis, and for his eventual daughter-in-law.

Following that trail, I found Wills, and further baptism and marriage records. The trail led eventually to Thomas Collis in Hurst at Whistley Mill.

I still wish Farmborough was part of our family!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-07-21, 04:55
Kit's Avatar
Kit Kit is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,716
Default

I made a great discovery and married Mary off, she had kids and all.

I went back to the tree to discover her husband was rather remarkable, having been born, married and died all by the age of 6.

I still haven't discovered Mary's fate.
__________________
Toni
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:08.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.