Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Family History General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 04-09-13, 21:47
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,310
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Piwacket View Post
That old chap must have been about 115 at least to remember Papitlal? Perhaps he was referring to Nitin's father 'being eager' to go to Kenya?
Nitin's father was born in Kenya.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-09-13, 06:31
Guinevere's Avatar
Guinevere Guinevere is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: in the middle
Posts: 2,006
Default

Just watched this now. Thought it got off to a slow start but picked up as it went along.

I taught a lot of Kenyan Asians in Coventry while I was training but not Nitin, I think.
__________________
Gwynne

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-09-13, 11:17
Piwacket's Avatar
Piwacket Piwacket is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Glorious Thames Valley
Posts: 945
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiterunner View Post
Nitin's father was born in Kenya.
OH was he? OK. I just remember Nitin finding out that G'dad when his rail contract was ended going back and bringing some family to Kenya.
__________________


Researching Gillett in Preston/Sheffield and Campbell and Wilkie and Hepburn in and around Glasgow
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-09-13, 12:08
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,310
Default

It was Nitin's great-grandfather who took his family from India to Kenya, so it could be that the old man remembered Nitin's grandfather, but we weren't told the date when they went, so I don't know how plausible that is.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-09-13, 15:41
anne fraser's Avatar
anne fraser anne fraser is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 538
Default

I enjoyed it. I was in work and watched it with a West Indian collegue who, had herself travelled to America and then England to find work which gave her an interesting perspective on the story,

I am not sure my ancestors would have been able to write six generations back' But I did wonder if that record actually dated back two hundred years when you consider the prevelance of child marriage.

I thought it was much more interesting than the last couple of episodes. I have not see Nick Hewer yet.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-09-13, 16:21
Piwacket's Avatar
Piwacket Piwacket is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Glorious Thames Valley
Posts: 945
Default

Thanks for reminding me KR - and as Anne says if they got married so young - their generation gap wouldn't be so great... didn't that researcher lady say the girls probably started families at 13 or 14 yrs.
__________________


Researching Gillett in Preston/Sheffield and Campbell and Wilkie and Hepburn in and around Glasgow
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-09-13, 17:27
Olde Crone Olde Crone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,846
Default

I think the record went back to his 7 x GGF, which was about 200 years ago. My 7 x GGPs were born in the late 1600s, early 1700s.

OC
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-09-13, 22:32
Tom Tom's Avatar
Tom Tom Tom Tom is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London
Posts: 567
Default

I thought it was good. Something that made me think was the fact that, as far as we know, only one out of the eight children's deaths were registered. It said there was no requirement to register the deaths so why was that one registered when the others weren't?

Just seemed a bit odd to me.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-09-13, 08:46
BlueSavannah's Avatar
BlueSavannah BlueSavannah is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: near Sudbury, Suffolk
Posts: 961
Default

I enjoyed this episode. I agree with Tom Tom that I also wondered why the parents chose to register the death of one child but not the other seven.
__________________
Claire
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-09-13, 14:24
Merry's Avatar
Merry Merry is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Christchurch, Dorset
Posts: 21,333
Default

I just watched this and really enjoyed it.

The only part where I wanted to ask more question (other than of the "well over 100" old man!) was when they were talking about the children of child brides. If Nitan's maternal grandfather married at 10 but travelled to Zanzibar when he was 14 for an apprenticeship, I wonder how long he was away? His bride was four years younger so presumably no children before he left India (and presumably she remained in India?), but was an apprenticeship seven years like in the UK or shorter? If it was seven years then his wife might have been 17 by the time he came back, so not really a young teen having babies.

It also bothered me that the death of the second to last child was registered by the father as he was supposed to have been bedridden for years. Maybe that happened a little later?

Only one episode for me to catch up now!
__________________
Merry

"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:31.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.