Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Members' Direct Ancestors > Take One 4xGreat-Grandparent

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-06-12, 10:12
Sue from Southend's Avatar
Sue from Southend Sue from Southend is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,309
Default

Found this on the Gloucestershire Archives site -
Memorandum of conviction of Nathaniel Hale of Rangeworthy, beer retailer and shopkeeper, for the crime of possessing two defective weights and a defective pair of scales in his shop, dated 9 May 1835 [printed form]
Date 1835

http://ww3.gloucestershire.gov.uk/DS...7hale%27%29%29

Perhaps he sold hats and beer??
__________________
Sue
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-06-12, 10:18
Sue from Southend's Avatar
Sue from Southend Sue from Southend is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,309
Default

And still with Gloucestershire Archives a Nathaniel Hale of Rangeworthy appears on the Overseers Records in 1837 and 1838. There may be more details if you contact the Archives.

http://ww3.gloucestershire.gov.uk/ge...y/Results.aspx

And if you look at the entry dated 1769 it's for a Nathaniel Hale of Kingswood where your one married....


Edit : Flower Hale also has Overseers records in 1838 http://ww3.gloucestershire.gov.uk/ge...y/Results.aspx
She would appear to be child. Did they name any of their children Flower or perhaps the Nathaniel in the Overseers records is their son and she's his daughter??
__________________
Sue

Last edited by Sue from Southend; 12-06-12 at 10:36. Reason: To add more information
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-06-12, 13:02
Margaret in Burton's Avatar
Margaret in Burton Margaret in Burton is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Burton upon Trent, Staffordshire
Posts: 5,186
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sue from Southend View Post
And still with Gloucestershire Archives a Nathaniel Hale of Rangeworthy appears on the Overseers Records in 1837 and 1838. There may be more details if you contact the Archives.

http://ww3.gloucestershire.gov.uk/ge...y/Results.aspx

And if you look at the entry dated 1769 it's for a Nathaniel Hale of Kingswood where your one married....


Edit : Flower Hale also has Overseers records in 1838 http://ww3.gloucestershire.gov.uk/ge...y/Results.aspx
She would appear to be child. Did they name any of their children Flower or perhaps the Nathaniel in the Overseers records is their son and she's his daughter??
I don't have children called Nathaniel or Flower but I have very little info concerning that family.
I did email the archives last night to ask about purchasing copy microfiche, I do have a reader, no reply as yet.

Don't want to appear dim, but what are Overseers records?
__________________
Marg

Last edited by Margaret in Burton; 12-06-12 at 13:05.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-06-12, 13:35
Sue from Southend's Avatar
Sue from Southend Sue from Southend is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,309
Default

This link describes Overseers Records pretty well. It's the second item down.

http://www.hidden-heritage.co.uk/category/poor-law/

Sometimes these sorts of records are a mine of information giving names of parents, place of birth etc. Another time it could just be the bare bones!
__________________
Sue
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-06-12, 15:15
Margaret in Burton's Avatar
Margaret in Burton Margaret in Burton is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Burton upon Trent, Staffordshire
Posts: 5,186
Default

I've just emailed the Archives to ask about ref P244 OV 3/2/4/31

Both Nathaniel and Flower are named in that and are from Rangeworthy.

Thanks for your help Sue.
__________________
Marg
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 13-06-12, 13:33
Margaret in Burton's Avatar
Margaret in Burton Margaret in Burton is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Burton upon Trent, Staffordshire
Posts: 5,186
Default

Had a reply from the archives and have asked for a quote for a copy. This is their email to me.

I can tell you that P244 OV 3/2/4 contains Removal Orders from the parish of Painswick. This means that Nathaniel and Flower were living in Painswick, but were not originally from there. It is likely they were claiming money from the church under the Poor Law, if they were not from that parish originally, they could be sent back to where they came from.

The quote will take up to 10 working days.

Wasn't even 10 hours lol

£6 + £1 P&P

Will be sending off for that.
__________________
Marg

Last edited by Margaret in Burton; 13-06-12 at 16:37.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 13-06-12, 16:39
Margaret in Burton's Avatar
Margaret in Burton Margaret in Burton is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Burton upon Trent, Staffordshire
Posts: 5,186
Default

Asked about buying copy microfiche.

Can't supply as they don't have copyright.

OK I understand that but their answer after that is ridiculous.


I am afraid that in the case of the Parish of Rangeworthy permission has not been granted, we do not hold copyright and so are unable to supply duplicate copies of the fiche. We are able to supply a paper copy of an individual BMD entry from these fiche for a charge of £6.00 per entry if the exact date, name and event is supplied. On receipt of a completed order form and remittance, we will conduct a search for the entry on the date supplied by you, but cannot guarantee that this event will be found on that date. The stated fee on the form includes both the time it takes to search for the event and to have one copy produced of the entry. However, if the search is not successful, this fee will cover the search time onl

If I knew the exact dates then why would I need the info from them?





I have told that that in a reply email.
__________________
Marg
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 13-06-12, 17:02
Sue from Southend's Avatar
Sue from Southend Sue from Southend is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,309
Default

I suspect that they're just covering their backs Marg! I'd have thought that the details you've supplied from their database should be enough.
Were you hoping to browse the Rangeworthy Prs by buying a copy of the fiche? As they can't supply that they're just saying that they won't do it for you! Some Archives will do something like that for an hourly charge with no guarantees but it can work out very expensive.
The Settlement/Removal papers may give you a lot of the information.
__________________
Sue
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 13-06-12, 17:23
Margaret in Burton's Avatar
Margaret in Burton Margaret in Burton is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Burton upon Trent, Staffordshire
Posts: 5,186
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sue from Southend View Post
I suspect that they're just covering their backs Marg! I'd have thought that the details you've supplied from their database should be enough.
Were you hoping to browse the Rangeworthy Prs by buying a copy of the fiche? As they can't supply that they're just saying that they won't do it for you! Some Archives will do something like that for an hourly charge with no guarantees but it can work out very expensive.
The Settlement/Removal papers may give you a lot of the information.
Yes I'm ordering those overseers records.

I asked them about buying copy fiche for the parish registers.

It just annoyed me that they would need the exact date of a baptism, marriage, burial before they could supply me with any info. I wanted to buy the fiche to get that info. If I knew it already then I wouldn't have asked to buy the fiche.
__________________
Marg
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 13-06-12, 20:37
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,680
Default

Marg, if they are anything like our local archives, they are hugely overstretched, with masses of admin to do and very little time even for cataloguing & conservation.

Now that I have home internet, I'm able to do "proper" research but am finding that some searches which ought to be simple are taking forever: poor quality images, entries not in chronological order etc etc.

The staff are unlikely to be deliberately obstructive (though I have met a few!) just very overworked and unable to spend much time on queries. Our staffing levels are down by 25%, in the whole arts sector over 30 people were made redundant, and those remaining have to take on extra duties.
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
to4g45


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:27.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.