#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sarah Pert can't have been born in 1790 if she had a child in 1801
![]()
__________________
"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010 |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This looks promising in 1841:
https://www.ancestry.co.uk/interacti...&usePUBJs=true as I think the couple listed after Sarah are her parents! (if this is her that is...) Sarah Harmer Port bap 24 Dec 1781 Alby, Norfolk parents Jonathan and Ann
__________________
"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010 |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin...48&usePUB=true another child, say's Mary was a widow? is that previous to the baptism or at the the time as in Thomas's widow? Ann Culley 26/7/1789 also what does baptised a pauper mean? I have never heard it before. https://www.ancestry.co.uk/interacti...&usePUBJs=true |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The baptism entry means that when Thomas married Mary her name was Mary Dyke, widow. The marriage entry says she was a widow too (FMP).
__________________
"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010 |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Oh and at the 1779 wedding Thomas Culley was a widower.
__________________
"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010 |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|