#11
|
|||
|
|||
Yes, it's their decision, Marg. Not everyone is infected with the genealogy bug like we are!
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
One of my first cousins (who I don't actually know due to an acrimonious divorce!), his son and a couple of granddaughters all seem to have had DNA tests for Christmas a couple of years ago with absolutely no interest in their family history. However I am eternally grateful to them as it means I can identify my paternal matches so much more easily.
__________________
Sue |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Sib doesn't want their DNA to be recognisable - I know quite a few people who do not want that information in the public domain. Out of respect to sib, my tree looks rather strange. I have only put in names four or five generations back, and that where the surnames are interesting.
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
On ancestry people can't see your DNA, just if you are a match which should make Sib feel better. Some sites you can inspect the segment and things but to me you might as well just hand it over.
__________________
Toni |
|
|