Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Members' Direct Ancestors > Take One 3xGreat-Grandparent

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-03-11, 08:29
maggie_4_7
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Hannah Deerning or Dunning (difficult to read on Banns)

My OH's father's mother's mother's mother's mother.

Name:
Hannah Deerning or Dunning (difficult to read on Banns)

Date and place of birth:
About 1795 in Lambeth, Surrey, England

Names of parents:
Not known

Date and place of baptism:
Not known

Details of each of his or her marriages:
Marriage to William Peters on 30th October 1814 at St Mary, Newington, Southwark London, England
http://search.ancestry.co.uk/iexec?h...id&pid=4468375


Occupation:
Bag Maker

Addresses where they lived (including county if in UK):

4 Garden Row, Fulham, London, England - 1841 Census
http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin...26pgPLz0q3dpid

6 Wilmer Gardens, Shoreditch, London, England - 1851 Census
http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin...26pgPLz0q3dpid

8 Ann Street, Mile End Old Town, London, England - 1861 Census
http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin...26pgPLz0q3dpid
(Hannah is listed as lodger when in fact Sarah Rodwell is her daughter)

Bethnal Green Workhouse, Bethnal Green, London, England - 1871 Census
http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin...26pgPLz0q3dpid


Date, place and cause of death:
Not known

Date and place of burial:
Not known

Details of will / administration of their estate:
Not known

Memorial inscription:
Not known

Last edited by maggie_4_7; 12-03-11 at 12:13. Reason: to correct DOB
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-03-11, 10:23
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,316
Default

If she got married in 1814 then she can't have been born in 1818?
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 21st May
Lancashire Non-conformist records new on Ancestry
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-03-11, 12:12
maggie_4_7
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiterunner View Post
If she got married in 1814 then she can't have been born in 1818?
Sorry I had Jane Miller on my mind when I typed that but now I know she's 1814 not 1818.

Corrected to abt 1795.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
to3g18

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:21.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.