Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Research Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09-05-21, 14:11
Tom Tom's Avatar
Tom Tom Tom Tom is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London
Posts: 567
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phoenix View Post
Do you have any abbott or Janaway matches? It would be worth looking at lower DNA matches, to see if they link to the new connection.


No, no other DNA matches coming down that line. In "shared matches" there are a few 4th-6th cousins, but none have been online for over a year, or have a tree online.
I haven't ever found any DNA matches to any Abbotts either.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-05-21, 14:13
Tom Tom's Avatar
Tom Tom Tom Tom is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London
Posts: 567
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crawfie View Post
Joseph and Phebe were married in 1788. According to the death reg. Joseph jr was 77 when he died in 1863 giving a dob of ca. 1786. On the 1851 his dob is 1791 and on the 1841 1786, so varies quite a bit. As well as Elizabeth, they also had John, 1796; Charles 1788; George 1790; Sarah 1794 and James in 1803. However I cannot find a baptism for Joseph - I have searched for him as child of Joseph and Phebe and also just Phebe. However the discs I have are transcriptions only, so some may be missing.

Could this be your James? It would have made him about 48 when Olivia was born. Do you have any idea as to his dob? If Joseph and Phoebe were the parents of both Joseph and James would that be consistent with the DNA findings?

Thanks Crawfie. My James could have been the son/daughter of one of Joseph's siblings, which I think is the most likely, but I just can't find anything out.

I have no idea how old James was when Olivia was born. I would imagine younger than 48 though as he was a Private at this point, but then recorded as a Barracks Sergt (decd) on her death certificate. I know he had died by 1880, but other than that, nothing!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-05-21, 21:59
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,639
Default

Probably unconnected, but in 1861:

Country Great Britain
Record set British Army, Worldwide Index 1861
First name James
Last name Janaway
Service number 551
Rank Private
Unit or Regiment 1st Btn 15th Foot (Yorkshire-East Riding)
Regiment stationed at Cork & Curragh
Year 1861
National Archives reference WO12 / 3279
Category Military, armed forces & conflict
Subcategory Regimental & Service Records
Collections from Great Britain, UK None

But he's 15th not 14th.
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-05-21, 07:26
maggie_4_7
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phoenix View Post
Probably unconnected, but in 1861:

Country Great Britain
Record set British Army, Worldwide Index 1861
First name James
Last name Janaway
Service number 551
Rank Private
Unit or Regiment 1st Btn 15th Foot (Yorkshire-East Riding)
Regiment stationed at Cork & Curragh
Year 1861
National Archives reference WO12 / 3279
Category Military, armed forces & conflict
Subcategory Regimental & Service Records
Collections from Great Britain, UK None

But he's 15th not 14th.
I did look on FMP there is a few records that could be him but not enough information on them. I went down that route because I think the key could be in his service records somewhere. It looks like he was a professional soldier for a fairly long time. Regiments aren't an indication because soldiers did change regiments often.

Tom I am assuming you don't have a marriage for James and Sophia from your post, not that it would tell you much but the area they married might. Forgive me if you have said you have a marriage.

Last edited by maggie_4_7; 10-05-21 at 08:12.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-05-21, 08:06
maggie_4_7
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Probably a total red herring because from my searches on Scotland's People Olivia's husband was Thomas Kerr but I suppose he could be second husband.

But putting in the thread for information might be a clue.

The Olivia here is very young, it's messy because there is no tabulation.

First name(s) Olivia
Last name Jannaway
Birth year 1851
Age 18
Marital status Spinster
Marriage year 1869
Marriage date 26 Jul 1869
Father's first name(s) James Henry
Father's last name Jannaway
Father's occupation Clerk
Spouse's first name(s) Martin
Spouse's last name Meskell
Spouse's birth year 1838
Spouse's age 31
Spouse's occupation Sergeant
Spouse's condition Bachelor
Spouse's father's occupation Shoemaker
First witness James Velly
Second witness Fanny Feard
Marriage place Gillingham, St Mark
County Kent
Country England
Archive Medway Archives
Archive reference P153E/1/9
Register type Marriages
Year range 1866-1876
Page 52
Record set Kent Marriages And Banns
Category Birth, Marriage, Death & Parish Records
Subcategory Parish Marriages
Collections from England, Great Britain

Last edited by maggie_4_7; 10-05-21 at 08:15.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-05-21, 08:24
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,639
Default

That is useful, Maggie, as the other records on FMP describe James as a Computer - consistent with being a clerk
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-05-21, 08:40
maggie_4_7
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phoenix View Post
That is useful, Maggie, as the other records on FMP describe James as a Computer - consistent with being a clerk
It is Olivia I found another marriage of Olivia Meskell to a Thomas Kerr in 1871 in Calcutta, Bengal, India. Thomas Kerr is on her death cert as husband.

Bride's age 19.Her father's name is transcribed as Henry and surname Shannon! So same person but is the original Olivia in Scotland someone else entirely or has her father's name got mixed up! Need to see original image to check transcription!

Checked image definitely Henry Shannon difficult to read Rank but of the 14th Regiment of Foot.

Last edited by maggie_4_7; 10-05-21 at 08:46.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-05-21, 09:07
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,639
Default

Is the Indian marriage an original document with signatures, or a registered copy? I could argue Jannaway was mistranscribed as Shannon.

Completely failing to find Olivia's father, which makes me wonder if he died in service. I hate army records - they seem much more difficult to follow than naval records.

The way forward might be to find out where the 14th was stationed. Of course James may well have died well before 1861 and Sophia remarried and Olivia travelled round the world with a stepfather.
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-05-21, 09:16
maggie_4_7
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phoenix View Post
Is the Indian marriage an original document with signatures, or a registered copy? I could argue Jannaway was mistranscribed as Shannon.

Completely failing to find Olivia's father, which makes me wonder if he died in service. I hate army records - they seem much more difficult to follow than naval records.

The way forward might be to find out where the 14th was stationed. Of course James may well have died well before 1861 and Sophia remarried and Olivia travelled round the world with a stepfather.
I looked at the image it is definitely Henry Shannon it's the original not sure what you mean one of the other Marriages have an X for Mark but Olivia's entry doesn't but looks to be in the same hand as the entry. It says on the transcription in bold below. So I think what you mean is this has been copied by hand from another document?

First name(s) Olivia
Last name Meskell
Marriage year 1871
Marriage date 20 May 1871
Spouse's first name Thomas
Spouse's last name Kerr
Place Calcutta
Presidency Bengal
Groom's age 31
Bride's age 19
Groom's father's first name Thomas
Groom's father's last name Kerr
Bride's father's first name Henry
Bride's father's last name Shannon
Catalogue description Parish register transcripts from the Presidency of Bengal, : 1713-1948
Archive reference N-1-136
Folio number 77
Entry number -
Record set British India Office Marriages
Category Birth, Marriage, Death & Parish Records
Subcategory Parish Marriages
Collections from Great Britain, UK None
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-05-21, 09:38
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,639
Default

Yes!

I have found the same problem with Scottish records. Because the marriages are copies, it offers the opportunity for transcription errors to creep in, like we see on censuses, where the enumerator has made mistakes.
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:18.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.