Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Members' Direct Ancestors > Take Two 5xGreat-Grandparents

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 05-08-13, 18:17
ElizabethHerts ElizabethHerts is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 9,293
Default

How did you link Mary Williams from your other thread to Mary/Eunice Williams, Jill?

You still don't have the baptism from 1788 and the mother on that thread.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-08-13, 18:17
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,303
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ElizabethHerts View Post
Thanks, Elizabeth. So:
Banns of Marriage, Between Thomas Barker and Mary Williams were published 18th and 25th of September, and on the 2d of Oct 1796 by me, Peter Wilson, curate. The said Thomas Barker of this Parish, Laborer, and Mary Williams, of this Parish, Singlewoman, were Married in this Church by Banns 3rd Nov 1796 by me Peter Wilson, Curate.

Thomas Barker signed his name and Mary Williams made her mark. Witnesses Jane Footitt and Thomas Stow.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-08-13, 18:20
ElizabethHerts ElizabethHerts is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 9,293
Default

So this is the marriage of Mary, the daughter:

http://www.lincstothepast.com/Record...696&iid=301047
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-08-13, 18:31
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,303
Default

Baptism 11 Dec 1797 - Nancy, Daughter of Thomas and Eunice Barker. Mary written, crossed out, and Eunice written in.

Burial Jan 21 1801 also at Gate Burton - Anne, Daughter of Mary Barker, widow, of Gainsbrough. (FamilySearch says this is the same person as Nancy above but I think this is just an assumption on the part of the indexer.)

Not sure whether this is the same family or not. Nancy was often used as a variant of Ann(e).

Then there is another Thomas Barker burial 4 Feb 1802. And Mary Barker, widow, of Gainsbrough, buried 5 Jan 1804, so if the burial that Elizabeth has found is your Mary / Eunice, the Gainsborough Mary is a different person.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-08-13, 18:34
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,303
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ElizabethHerts View Post
Here's Mary Barker in Gate Burton in 1841:

1841 Census
BARKER, Mary
Gate Burton, Lincolnshire
HO107 piece 629 folio 16/4 page 2
Age 75, Pau[per], born in county.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-08-13, 18:45
ElizabethHerts ElizabethHerts is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 9,293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiterunner View Post
Age 75, Pau[per], born in county.
My eyes couldn't read the occupation, Kate.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-08-13, 18:58
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,303
Default

FamilySearch has a baptism for a Robert Barker at All Saints, Gainsborough, 10 Nov 1790, son of Mary Barker, but I can't find the PR on Lincs to the Past to check whether this Mary is a widow. (Just trying to prove that FamilySearch are wrong to tie up Nancy Barker baptised in Gate Burton with Anne Barker from Gainsborough who was buried at Gate Burton.)
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-08-13, 20:44
Jill Jill is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,177
Default

Thankyou both for your input, I am very grateful and I will take a proper look in the morning when I am less tired.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-08-13, 09:07
Jill Jill is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,177
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiterunner View Post
It looks (on Lincs to the Past) as though her name was written as Mary and then this was crossed out and Eunice written in instead, Jill.
Thankyou, I had only seen it on Familysearch and didn't know Lincs to the past had it (I find the site very awkward to use)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ElizabethHerts View Post
How did you link Mary Williams from your other thread to Mary/Eunice Williams, Jill?

You still don't have the baptism from 1788 and the mother on that thread.
Sorry, somewhat behind with my homework there, I had it on my laptop but hadn't amended the entry here. After JayG had found the burial of her daughter Mary Williams that gave me a dob of c1788, and as Gate Burton is very close to Glentworth I felt it likely that Mary/Eunice in 1788 was the appropriate one.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
tt5g34


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:50.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.