|
#61
11-01-11, 20:09
|
||||
|
||||
I know this is a while before Wm's birth, but Thomas was certainly old enough to be married by this date.
Marriage: 12 Feb 1792 St Mary the Virgin, Prestwich, Lancashire, England Thomas Whittaker - (X), of Chadderton in this Parish Alice Roe - (X), of Chadderton in this Parish Witness: Geo. Horrocks; Benjamin Lees Married by Banns by: Hy. Housman Source: LDS Film 2113205
__________________
"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010 
|
|
#62
11-01-11, 20:19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well possibly not the right person as there does appear to be a parallel family of Whittakers and Garlicks, but I'm clutching at the fact that Thomas appears to be known as Thomas Whittaker Garlick.
There is an Edward/Edmund Garlick who is a surgeon and of Chadderton, so there might be a posh line who left Wills, lol. No, I still can't see how to order that Will, it doesn't appear on the Cheshire site. I think I will have to order the film from the LDS. OC
|
|
#63
11-01-11, 20:40
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
|
|
#64
11-01-11, 21:09
|
|||
|
|||
|
That's the last resort Merry, as films from the LDS are now £7 whereas a copy Will from Cheshire is only £3.50, lol!
A kind person has sent me a transcription of the Alice Bickerstaff marriage, which has no date or venue. I have just realised also, that if that is MY Thomas marrying Alice Bickerstaff, he would only have been 15 - not impossible of course but a bit unlikely, and only one child in 19 years of marriage??? OC
|
|
#65
11-01-11, 22:08
|
||||
|
||||
|
Noooo, Thomas was b in the 1760s! It was William who was b 1799! (I had to write it down as I keep getting confused.) I liked the Alice Roe marriage better than the Bickerstaff one. There are a couple of Thomas/Alice Whittaker births between 1792 and 1801 but they could easily be someone else
__________________
"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
|
|
#66
11-01-11, 22:49
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thomas was born 1765 and the marriage to Alice Bickerstaff was in 1780, so not likely to be the right one.
Yours looks quite promising EXCEPT...I passed over some Whittaker/Lees births which are definitely not anything to do with the Whittaker Garlick mob. I need to retrace my steps... ...and I need to find my brain as well, because the marriage you posted is Roe, not Lees, lol! OC
|
|
#67
11-01-11, 22:53
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I must finish this (Christmas) scotch and go to bed, I think!!
__________________
"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
|
 |
| Tags |
| to3g9 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
