#1
|
||||
|
||||
Amelia Chandler (FMFM)
Name - "official" name and what they were known as
Amelia Chandler Date and place of birth 27/07/1838 in Beckenham, Kent Names of parents Arthur Chandler and Jane Taylor Date and place of baptism - if applicable 24/08/1838 at St. George's Church, Beckenham, Kent Details of each of his or her marriages - if any 1. to George Inman on 27/10/1856 at St. John's, Penge, Surrey 2. to Arthur Richards on 20/07/1892 at Wesleyan Church, Uralla, NSW, Australia Occupation(s) - if any 1881: butcher and summerhouse builder employing 2 men 1892: grazier Addresses where they lived (including county if in UK) - and please list which censuses you have or haven't found him/her on. 1841: Upper Elms End, Beckenham, Kent 1851: Ham Farm Lodge, Beckenham Lane, Shirley, Croydon, Surrey 1856: St. Barnabas, South Kennington, London 1859: Undercliffe, Bradford, Yorkshire 1861: 9 Carver Court, Bradford 1871/1881: 100 Otley Road, Bradford 1885: Emigrated to Australia 1892-1909: Balala, NSW, Australia Date, place and cause of death 08/09/1909 at Balala, NSW, Australia Cause: cerebral haemorrhage and cardiac syncope Date and place of burial / cremation. 09/09/1909 at Church of England Cemetery, Uralla, NSW, Australia Details of will / administration of their estate - if applicable None known Memorial inscription - if any Not known Last edited by Mary from Italy; 12-03-10 at 18:30. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
By 1861, Elms End is called Elmers End on the census - its modern name. I can't immediately find it in 1851, but I do wonder whether it always was Elmers, or if people found ELms End just too difficult to say!
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
My great-grandfather was born at Elmers End in 1862. His birth certificate said Elmore End, and he had it corrected later on.
__________________
KiteRunner Family History News updated 21st May Lancashire Non-conformist records new on Ancestry |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
I have an 1835 baptism for this family which says Elmer's End in the parish register. "Elms End" was quoted exactly from the 1841 census image, but I think it was just the enumerator's mistake.
|
Tags |
to2g9 |
|
|