#51
|
||||
|
||||
Well, it's good that I know not to waste my time following the wrong line! If only FamilySearch didn't have stupid marriage transcriptions giving the groom's marital status as "married", I would have had a strong inkling from when I found it that it was the wrong marriage. I needed the groom to be a widower and it turns out it says bachelor. I wonder whether the FamilySearch is taken from something that doesn't give the marital status (e.g. BT's or an index) and they just put a random value in, or if they just got it (and a lot of other entries) wrong.
__________________
KiteRunner Family History News updated 21st May Lancashire Non-conformist records new on Ancestry |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Well I have managed to get back two more generations on one of OH's line on both sides and harvested quite a few baptisms and marriages to backup info I already had from someone but me being me like to see the evidence. They didn't have any documents to show me and said to me 'oh I'm sure that's right because so and so has had it on their tree for years'!!
But my god there's so many with the same names all intermarrying I know they're all connected but not sure how at the moment but if I saved all the images I'd not have enough room on my PC eventually. Managed to get another two days subscription because of hassle last week so now I am on the trail of the other set of Lewseys who married the Clarks unfortunately the Cole side is a dead end I can't seem to find anything further back than what I already have for Thomas Cole born about 1800 Witham, Essex well I can't find a baptism but one of the church records only start in middle 1800s so I expect thats the one. Although I did find his marriage to Mary Beard and his children's baptisms so they are confirmed now too. Bloody expensive though not if you can do it all in one week but obviously one can't usually but its still worth it if you have to travel long way or you can't travel that far at the moment. I think I will send an email to them though about the charges and also the coverage and expectation just from a customer service point of view maybe they'll take it on board. I don't think people mind paying for things but it needs to be sensible in the charging structure. |
#53
|
||||
|
||||
Glad to hear it was so useful for you, Maggie. I found a few things to confirm stuff I had in my tree and of course that one that proved my tree was wrong!
__________________
KiteRunner Family History News updated 21st May Lancashire Non-conformist records new on Ancestry |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Did it not put you on another or right track though?
It isn't a brilliant service though as you know. I wonder if as I said before with this FH explosion they might think it a cash cow to bolster their money for the council. Most of OH's father's side came from the villages of Essex its been a bit of a blackhole to be honest (although I had info I'm always wary of it unless I see the proof) and I'm not averse to going to RO but sometimes its nice to be an armchair FH and do it in the comfort of your own PC. So I am grateful for that but it could be better to be honest. I like the online thing (its nice to do the physical visiting which I have done) there are a lot of people that can't travel now and still want and have and interest also if you weigh up the consequential expenses of travelling sometimes its worth it to bite the bullet and subscribe. |
#55
|
||||
|
||||
No. Maybe when they put the wills online. What I really need to do is look at the Leyton PR's but they're not covering those.
__________________
KiteRunner Family History News updated 21st May Lancashire Non-conformist records new on Ancestry |
#56
|
||||
|
||||
So you have all had time to use it. Is it good and easy to use?
If you get a days sub you can search as much as you like? Just a note for the nonEU people here. We get a slightly cheaper price as we don't have to pay the VAT.
__________________
Toni |
#57
|
||||
|
||||
Good, yes. Easy to use, no. If you get a day's sub can you search as much as you like? Yes.
__________________
KiteRunner Family History News updated 21st May Lancashire Non-conformist records new on Ancestry |
#58
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks Kate. Will have a look over the holidays.
__________________
Toni |
#59
|
||||
|
||||
I've bitten the bullet and taken out a week's sub (just expired today) and trawled through the registers.
It's aggravating not to have an index - although some registers have an index at the back - and others at the front, just to be contrary - so a lot of trawling. I had to wait for each image to load, whereas looking on film is quicker. I found a lot of what I wanted, but golly I wish they'd at least have provided a guide that said Image 2 & 3 blank pages Images 4-10 marriages 1730-1790 Images 11-23 baptisms 1730-1783 or something to give a clue to how much you need to trawl through. I suppose its cheaper than a trip to the records office, but its unwieldy when I'm used to the speed of Ancestry & FMP.
__________________
Love from Nell researching Chowns in Buckinghamshire & Oxfordshire Brewer, Broad, Eplett & Pope in Cornwall Smoothy & Willsher/Wiltshire in Essex & Surrey Emms, Mealing + variants, Purvey & Williams in Gloucestershire Barnes, Dunt, Gray, Massingham, Saul/Seals/Sales in Norfolk Matthews & Nash in Warwickshire |
#60
|
||||
|
||||
Still waiting for the parishes in Waltham Forest Borough to be added - quite a few of mine are going to be in there.
__________________
KiteRunner Family History News updated 21st May Lancashire Non-conformist records new on Ancestry |
|
|