Quote:
Originally Posted by kiterunner
Yes; like I said, I had seen the 98.5% figure bandied about a lot in replies on Facebook etc, but then when I was reading one of their guides, it said it with reference to "readable pages", and I assume that all the - - - entries, the ones with ? in, etc, don't count as "readable" and therefore aren't included in the accuracy stats.
|
Hmmm, I bet we could have read a large percentage of the 'unreadable' records. I've not seen anything to suggest a lot of these records are damaged in some way or anything similar.