|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Theres a story there, for sure, but not relative to this inquiry. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kate
Sorry, it was late when I posted and I didn't explain. I didn't mean the 1900 birth was him, I meant that the information on his gravestone that he was the loved son of Hermand Sackville was slightly wrong and should probably have read Herbrand. My thinking is that the father of Herbrand born 1900 was probably Ernest's father too, because it is an almighty coincidence if not. How else would a name like that be remembered and be important enough to go on his gravestone? Even though it was slightly wrong! Of course, I could be barking up the wrong tree. Again. OC |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Or maybe Hermand Parsons, born 1873, is something to do with it!
OC |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
If, by WW1, Ernest is naming his foster mother as next of kin, it suggests that he had no contact with his birth parents. He was presumably left with the Parsons when he was a baby. They may have known as little about his real parents as we do. There's no guarantee that Ernest was his birth name, while Cavey reminds me of havey-cavey, which could have been a phrase the foster parents used.
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
I lie. That was the other marriage on the page. Hermand married an Amy Brindley.
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Phoenix
One of the reasons this thread caught my eye and triggered my imagination, is because it reminds me of a similar thread on another forum, where the aristocrats dealt discreetly with their illegitimate offspring by fostering them with either a poor relative or a trusted employee - a nurserymaid in this case. It was obvious from the change in circumstances of the nurserymaid that money was being supplied. The birth of that child was not registered, or at least, not in any identifiable form, but of course, money always talks, so could easily just not have been registered. Similar time, late 1800s. The child did know some details of his father's family but they were mangled, unusual names not quite right etc. (The nurserymaid was not the birth mother). OC |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
KiteRunner Family History News updated 15th May Edinburgh Poor Law Records 1817-1852 new on Ancestry |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
And from looking at his divorce papers, Gilbert certainly got around, but there is no mention of anyone who could have been Ernest's mother, so it is possible he was the father but there is no evidence there.
__________________
KiteRunner Family History News updated 15th May Edinburgh Poor Law Records 1817-1852 new on Ancestry |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|