Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Family History General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 22-05-23, 11:50
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,650
Default Missing registers

Hunting through the Hampshire records on Ancestry, there are heaps of my people missing from the record.

Looking at Bursledon, for example, there is a gap 1717-1792. According to the Hampshire Archives website, the records are continuous 1657-1992: https://calm.hants.gov.uk/Record.asp...id=83130&pos=9


I used to be surrounded with books. These days I google for answers. Does anyone know if records exist for the gap?
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22-05-23, 12:09
ElizabethHerts ElizabethHerts is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 9,293
Default

The registers for Bramshaw are also in a dire state and it's only by browsing that I have been able to find entries. Record keeping seems to have been very hit and miss with just one burial for 1754. I know my ancestor died in that year as he wrote his will in July and it was proved in December, but there is no entry for him.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 22-05-23, 12:09
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,301
Default

The Bursledon burials for that period are indexed on FMP but the baptisms only from the last few years of that gap, and the only pre-1754 marriages which come up on FMP are marriage licences.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 22-05-23, 14:49
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,650
Default

More by luck than judgement, I have found my NIPR volume for Hampshire, which does not indicate major gaps in Bursledon.

But I agree,Elizabeth, that record keeping was pretty poor.


The simple answer in this case, is that the records (abysmal quality) are under Hound and Hamble.
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:26.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.