Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Research Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #131  
Old 25-03-21, 14:03
Qwackers Qwackers is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: over wyre coast
Posts: 1,243
Default

hi think they were the only ones .
Reply With Quote
  #132  
Old 09-12-21, 07:16
Qwackers Qwackers is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: over wyre coast
Posts: 1,243
Default

hi , I have come across family tree with george and esther whalley nee heyes . It is showing that john heyes esther's father married a jane birch . in 1861 skelmersdale . i contacted the owner of the tree and he says it's correct . Yet we thought that esther's mother was mary smallshaw . any ideas ? thanks
Reply With Quote
  #133  
Old 09-12-21, 07:22
Qwackers Qwackers is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: over wyre coast
Posts: 1,243
Default

sorry i meant to put on post 33 .
Reply With Quote
  #134  
Old 09-12-21, 07:40
Qwackers Qwackers is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: over wyre coast
Posts: 1,243
Default

I looked for esther's birth and found a esther heyes mmn Birch .
Reply With Quote
  #135  
Old 09-12-21, 07:46
Qwackers Qwackers is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: over wyre coast
Posts: 1,243
Default

that is in upholland 1868 on lancs bmd
Reply With Quote
  #136  
Old 09-12-21, 10:22
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,270
Default

According to post #32, your Esther Heyes was age 19 in 1891, which would mean she was born in 1871 or 1872, not 1868.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #137  
Old 09-12-21, 10:23
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,270
Default

Also, people usually do think their own tree is correct but that doesn't necessarily mean it is.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #138  
Old 09-12-21, 10:31
Qwackers Qwackers is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: over wyre coast
Posts: 1,243
Default

i've just checked her marriage feb 1882 her age is 15 . so it's possible that her birth could be 1867/8. around the time jane birch gave birth to esther . Isn't it ?
Reply With Quote
  #139  
Old 09-12-21, 10:48
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,270
Default

Post #33 says the marriage was in Nov 1887?
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #140  
Old 09-12-21, 10:50
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,270
Default

Lancashire OPC has the date as 28 Nov 1887.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:55.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.