Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Research Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #111  
Old 06-01-22, 08:48
Olde Crone Olde Crone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,823
Default

If you look on lan-opc, there are several births to Thomas and Cicely, but William's birth is only listed with Thomas as father, so mother not proven. Also, Thomas and Cicely married in 1809 - although that may not be the correct marriage, I can't immediately find another.

OC
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 06-01-22, 08:48
Merry's Avatar
Merry Merry is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Christchurch, Dorset
Posts: 21,310
Default

I wouldn't bother until they have told you how they know this is the correct William Hale. They may have evidence of course, but it wouldn't be the first time a family with more unusual parents names has been selected because there's a better chance of finding them elsewhere rather than because they are the right people! Please note, I'm not saying they are incorrect, just that they need to tell you their evidence. All you have is that he was born in Lancashire around 1795, which may or may not be correct.

If it were me, whilst I was waiting, I would be looking on Lancs OPC to see if there was any indication that this child of Thomas and Cicely died in childhood.

You may not get much sense out of anyone on here today, given the one hundred year wait for the 1921 census was over last night at midnight!
__________________
Merry

"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 06-01-22, 08:55
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,301
Default

Did your William have a daughter named Cicely? Obviously it wouldn't prove that it was his mother's name, but it could be an indication.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 06-01-22, 10:40
Merry's Avatar
Merry Merry is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Christchurch, Dorset
Posts: 21,310
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiterunner View Post
Did your William have a daughter named Cicely? Obviously it wouldn't prove that it was his mother's name, but it could be an indication.
I've made that mistake before!
__________________
Merry

"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 06-01-22, 11:16
Olde Crone Olde Crone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,823
Default

Ok, looks very unlikely that William's mother was Cicely, see as follows.

?(6 July 1794 St Andrew Maghull, John Bale s/o Thomas and Ann, husbandman of Maghull.)
12 Feb 1797 St Thomas Maghull, William s/o Thomas Hale, leabourer (sic)
1 Dec 1799, St T. Henery(sic)s/o Thomas Hale, of Maghull, labourer.
21 Nov 1802 St T, Thomas, s/o Thomas Hale of Maghull, labourer.

BURIAL - St Thomas Melling ,1 Aug 1807 Ann Hale wife of Thomas Hale labourer of Melling.

MARRIAGE - St James Toxteth 14 June 1812
Thomas Hale, widower, farmer
Cicily Guy, widow.

Then a whole raft of children ten in all, youngest called Cicely, all very easily found on Lan opc.,

But you do need to wait for your contact who may know something we don't know!


And final proof that Cicely wasn't William's mother -

Death 1871 Ormskirk, Cecily Hale aged 81.
OC

Last edited by Olde Crone; 06-01-22 at 11:30. Reason: Added
Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old 06-01-22, 15:50
Qwackers Qwackers is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: over wyre coast
Posts: 1,243
Default

hi. yes i think your right , i need to know how they have connected thomas and cicely to william hale . i will let you know when i find out thanks
Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old 06-01-22, 16:00
Qwackers Qwackers is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: over wyre coast
Posts: 1,243
Default

hi , i've noted that they have got cicely guy as mother , and as you have displayed it can't be her . thanks
Reply With Quote
  #118  
Old 06-01-22, 16:14
Olde Crone Olde Crone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,823
Default

Oh dear, I should have read the whole thread before I jumped in! Then I would have known that William was Catholic and therefore Thomas and Cicely would be too, which they weren't.

Oh well, it passed a few rainy hours.

OC
Reply With Quote
  #119  
Old 06-01-22, 16:50
Qwackers Qwackers is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: over wyre coast
Posts: 1,243
Default

Hi just found out that ann of thomas and ann died in 1807 according to another tree of the hales , this could explain a marriage to cicely guy later . so she could be the stepmother if the tree is correct but the catholic birth has thrown the tree into confusion . yes i forgot william was a catholic and as such was buried as a catholic . i will see what the tree owners say . thanks
Reply With Quote
  #120  
Old 06-01-22, 16:55
Olde Crone Olde Crone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,823
Default

I put that burial on my post above.

OC
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:24.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.