Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Family History Stories

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-03-10, 15:45
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,618
Default What they were known as

I find it rather sad that I don't know what most of my ancestors were known as.

Was at a funeral yesterday & met up with a second cousin who is suddenly interested in family history.

She said "I started off by asking Mum what her grandparents were known as, and she said 'Bill and Emma' "

And they become real people. (If only I'd asked the same question, not "what were their names?")
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-03-10, 16:30
maggie_4_7
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

To be honest its not possible to know is it really.

My maternal grandmother had a few choice names for some of them that she imparted and some usual derivatives i.e. Polly, Jack and one really obscure one 'jewel' that turned out to be someone we think was called Martha that I'll probably never get to the bottom of!

What I'd like to see is some photographs of some of mine. I have none past my maternal grandfather and only one of him and I'm beginning to doubt its him anyway! I have none of any of the others, anything above my maternal grandmother I haven't any photos on either side or any of my grandmother's peers in her family.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-03-10, 17:34
Rachel's Avatar
Rachel Rachel is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 731
Default

Ahhhh photographs
How I long to discover if the original photos of the Gt Gt Grandparents still exist.
All I have are two not very good photocopies, for which I'm very grateful ..... but .......

Until a few years ago, one of the Gt Grans (Elizabeth) seemed a very serious, boring and 'worthy' person but after contact with a distant cousin, she became Lizzie and what a difference that's made !
She has a real personality + I had a tiny B/W pic of her which I'd never bothered to look at properly and when enlarged, discovered a cat on her shoulder
Now I think she must have been lively and fun and not the dour Scot I imagined.

At the risk of boring everyone again .... here she is


__________________
Rachel
FOR PHOTO RESTORATIONS, PLEASE SCAN AT 300-600 dpi AND AT LEAST 100% SCALE.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-03-10, 17:42
maggie_4_7
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

What a brlliant photograph although I must say the cat looks like its sitting on the dogs head rather than 'herself's' shoulder !
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-03-10, 17:45
ElizabethHerts ElizabethHerts is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 9,275
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel View Post
Ahhhh photographs

Until a few years ago, one of the Gt Grans (Elizabeth) seemed a very serious, boring and 'worthy' person but after contact with a distant cousin, she became Lizzie and what a difference that's made !
She has a real personality + I had a tiny B/W pic of her which I'd never bothered to look at properly and when enlarged, discovered a cat on her shoulder
Now I think she must have been lively and fun and not the dour Scot I imagined.
Rachel, my rather fearsome 2xgt grandmother was also Elizabeth, but after I found out she was always called Bessie I had a slightly different view of her!

My grandmother was christened and registered as Muriel Mary. However, she was always called "Mimi"! (from both names)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-03-10, 17:47
ElizabethHerts ElizabethHerts is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 9,275
Default

Oh, and that reminds me, my grandfather's first name was Cecil, which my grandmother, Mimi, didn't like - she always called him John!

Thankfully my mum told me this snippet because I never knew my grandfather as he died before I was born.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-03-10, 19:22
anne fraser's Avatar
anne fraser anne fraser is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 538
Default

One of my grandfather's sisters was Emma Louisa known to her brothers as Lemonsqueeser.

Since the ggggrandparent challenge has rekindled my interest in family history I have discovered several millitary records which include a physical description. Knowing that some one was five foot tall and giner or five foot eleven and blond helps bring them to life.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-03-10, 21:25
marquette's Avatar
marquette marquette is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,251
Default

My nanna was Eleanor but was always called Nell, but so was her mother, who was baptised Helen. Eleanor's daughter is Elaine - she isn't called Nell, but the names are all variations of the same, but I don't know if they realised it at the time.

My grandfather (not Nell's husband who was Jimmy), was always called Bob, but was registered as Cecil Alfred Herbert. His siblings were Tom, Dick, Bill, Kit and Gypsy - only Bill being anything close to his real name - Kit's real name was the same as her mothers.

Mum only knew her great-aunt as Aunty Cissy but her name was Rebecca - the only girl in family of seven.

Then there's my husbands grandmother who was called Ruth, but for some obscure reason, her husbands family always called her Jean.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-03-10, 08:05
garstonite's Avatar
garstonite garstonite is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: garston liverpool
Posts: 1,089
Default

This is very true..."if only"...I am fortunate to have photos of my grandparents and we were a close family,,,,but...one thing I will never know why...because I didn`t ask..
my mum was
Enid Miriam Anson.....and her dad (my grandad ) always called her DEL
Where do you get Del from Enid Miriam ?.....I`ll be wondering the rest of my life.....allan
__________________
ALLAN
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-03-10, 10:43
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,618
Default

[QUOTE=maggie_4_7;63297]To be honest its not possible to know is it really.

QUOTE]

But if you can find out, I feel you should make the effort. When I started, I was interested in the genealogy, rather than the fh side. Progressively, I feel that some ancestors might not recognise the thumbnail sketches I have of them.

All the Edmunds I have in my tree... when they appear as Edward in a census, it must mean that they were known as Ned or Eddie - but which?

And yes, I value photos hugely. Physical descriptions I am a little more wary of. I watch men shrinking, then growing again. Hair colour changing, even eyes. Some must have been more accurate than others - but which?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:39.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.