Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Research Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-12-17, 15:22
Michael's Avatar
Michael Michael is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: In between here and over there
Posts: 331
Default Opinions please - is this the right one?

What I know for sure about my 4g-grandmother Jane Palmer:

- married Samuel Berry 9th November 1797, Lubenham, Leicestershire
- son John Berry born 1799, Lubenham
- daughter Jane Berry born 1803, Lubenham
- daughter Mary Berry born 1806, Lubenham
- died 28th October 1831, Lubenham

My Ancestry "hints" are now showing me a baptism record for Jane Palmer on 7th December 1770, in Little Dalby, Leicestershire, parents Edward and Comfort Palmer (there is a corresponding marriage of Edward Palmer and Comfort Dalby, 11th January 1765, St Margaret, Leicester). Little Dalby is sufficiently close to Lubenham to make it plausible that this is the same person, but sufficiently far (~20 miles) not to be completely certain. Does anyone have any thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-12-17, 16:02
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,302
Default

Witnesses to the Samuel Berry / Jane Palmer marriage were William Williamson and Thos Eldridge, but Thos Eldridge is on all the marriages, so we can ignore him.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-12-17, 16:07
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,302
Default

Little Dalby burial 12 Jan 1791: Jane Palmer aged 20 OTP, daughter of Edward and Comfort Palmer:
https://search.findmypast.co.uk/reco...hlights=%22%22
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-12-17, 16:09
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,302
Default

Also, you probably have your Jane's age at death already, but if not, her burial record says 63 years. Of course it might not be accurate.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-12-17, 16:21
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,302
Default

Looking at a map, Lubenham is right on the boundary with Northamptonshire, so we might need to look there too.

There is a Jane Palmer baptised 1769 at Melton Mowbray, daughter of John and Ann, but that's not very close to Lubenham.

And one baptised 6 Nov 1768, daughter of Richard and Jane:
https://search.findmypast.co.uk/reco...hlights=%22%22
FMP gives the parish as "Langtons". There are various villages whose names end in Langton, just near Market Harborough (as is Lubenham), and together they make up the Langtons. So that one looks more likely.

There is a Jane Palmer buried at Langtons 13 Sep 1784 but that could be Jane sr.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-12-17, 21:55
Michael's Avatar
Michael Michael is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: In between here and over there
Posts: 331
Default

Thanks Kite - I see the same record appears twice on FMP, with the second specifying Tur Langton. As you say, that looks likely, and if there's a burial corresponding to the Little Dalby one at least I can be sure it isn't that one!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-12-17, 22:09
Michael's Avatar
Michael Michael is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: In between here and over there
Posts: 331
Default

There's a marriage of Richard Palmer to Jane Waters, both of the chapelry of Tur Langton (I presume a chapelry was a subdivision of a parish?), 11th October 1767. One of the witnesses was Thomas Berry, but he was a serial witness so that doesn't prove any connection to a Berry family.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:59.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.