#1
|
|||
|
|||
William HARE
Link to daughter Mary Ann Hare on TOGG3: http://www.genealogistsforum.co.uk/f...ight=mary+hare
Name - "official" name and what they were known as William Hare Date and place of birth Names of parents Date and place of baptism - if applicable Details of each of his or her marriages - if any Married to Elizabeth (nee ??). All their children were born in Enfield Middlesex but no marriage found. Occupation(s) - if any There's a possiblility he was a fishmonger but no proof Addresses where they lived (including county if in UK) - and please list which censuses you have or haven't found him/her on (if s/he lived in census times!). 1789-1807 had 9 children baptised at St Andrew Enfield Date, place and cause of death Possible burial for William Hare 9 Mar 1851 age 85. On 1841 census there's a William Hare, right age for this man, fishmonger, but his wife(?) isn't Elizabeth, and I haven't found a death for Elizabeth or a remarriage for him. What makes it more likely he is the right one is a burial for William Hare junior in 1811, fishman, the right age to be his son. Date and place of burial. Details of will / administration of their estate - if applicable Memorial inscription - if any |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
I can't find the 1841 census entry, Lindsay; could you post up the details, please?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Afraid I can't find the notes I made - as I wasn't sure it was the right person I put them to one side... Fatal.
From memory it was William Hare, fishmonger, living in Enfield with Mary Hare. The age roughly matched the William Hare buried 1851 so dob about 1766 (there is a matching baptism for this William in Enfield). (No Ancestry at the moment so I can't check myself). Edit - just found some notes saying I had a possible burial for Elizabeth - St Andrew Enfield, 30 April 1843, age 84 ie born c. 1759. So she should be in 1841 census, but I never managed to find her. Last edited by Lindsay; 27-12-11 at 20:51. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Right, thanks. Ancestry have them down as Hau. Mary doesn't have to be his wife; she could be a sister, sister-in-law, or some other relative.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
That's true, it's proving it that's the problem!
Thanks for looking - I'll make a note of the mistranscription so I can find him when I get Ancestry access back. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
I've submitted a correction anyway.
|
Tags |
to4g21 |
|
|