Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Family History General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 31-08-14, 21:14
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,652
Default Child deaths

A friend is curious about a foster child, brought up in an aunt's house and on the 1911 census.

The child, aged 7, is given the aunt's surname. Birthplace is stated.

The family story is that this child died during the influenza outbreak after WW1, in another town.

I have found a child born in birthplace A in 1903, and a child of the same name dying in deathplace B in 1918 aged 15.

Does this actually prove anything? Would it be worthwhile getting the two certificates? Would they prove anything?
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 31-08-14, 21:38
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,304
Default

I should think it depends on how rare the name is really, Phoenix.
If it is the right person and they did really die of influenza then it should give that as the cause of death on the death cert. Also it might give details of one or other parent on the death cert.
Is the surname on the index the aunt's surname? And could that be the same as the surname of one of the child's parents?
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-09-14, 08:16
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,652
Default

The aunt's surname is rare (to me, at least) but the child's surname is not. (No death of a child with the aunt's surname - sorry, I should have made that clear)

I am told that influenza was so rife that the undertakers could not cope and families had to find their own coffins. Certainly, the average death rate appears to be four or five of that christian name in "normal" quarters and 14 in December.

If my friend recognises the surname, all well and good, but I feel that there could easily be two or even three different children involved here. Especially as my friend is not convinced that even the christian name is original.

I have suggested school/workhouse records as a possible way forward. I may add that she is a much more experienced researcher than I am, but doesn't use computers at home.
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-09-14, 19:35
Nell's Avatar
Nell Nell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,480
Default

So the child only has the rarer surname of the aunt, when on the census? Birth and death registered in more common name?

My grandmother's aunt had an adopted child, Frederick Foyle, in 1911 census, with his birth surname, not hers. I think she may have been looking after him to boost her income - I found him in 1901 with his parents. It explained a letter I found addressed "Dear Madam" (no name or address given) written from the captain of a ship, about this chap, who died at sea. I didn't know what the connection was, until I saw the 1911 entry and realised "Madam" must be Elizabeth Vine.
__________________
Love from Nell
researching
Chowns in Buckinghamshire & Oxfordshire
Brewer, Broad, Eplett & Pope in Cornwall
Smoothy & Willsher/Wiltshire in Essex & Surrey
Emms, Mealing + variants, Purvey & Williams in Gloucestershire
Barnes, Dunt, Gray, Massingham, Saul/Seals/Sales in Norfolk
Matthews & Nash in Warwickshire
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:26.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.