Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Research Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 17-03-10, 21:26
peppie peppie is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 113
Default Herpes circa 1893

If you were in the army in 1893 and had herpes and was in the hospital for 10 days.... do you think it would be more likely to be genital or cold sores about the mouth?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 17-03-10, 21:41
Olde Crone Olde Crone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,826
Default

I doubt if genital herpes was either known or diagnosable in 1896!

Herpes covers a vast number of illnesses and one of these is Chicken Pox, which can make you quite poorly as an adult. another form of Herpes is shingles, again a nasty illness for an adult.

OC
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 17-03-10, 21:56
peppie peppie is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 113
Default

It's on his army record........
It says unknown (how gotten), local and no affect to the lungs.....
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17-03-10, 22:09
Kit's Avatar
Kit Kit is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,716
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peppie View Post
If you were in the army in 1893 and had herpes and was in the hospital for 10 days.... do you think it would be more likely to be genital or cold sores about the mouth?
I have several (distant) relatives in WW1 who were hospitalised for an STD, syphillis from memory, don't think there was a case of herpes though.

Most of mine were young and single. I was upset at the married man though as I though he risked transmitting it to his young wife.
__________________
Toni
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17-03-10, 22:32
Olde Crone Olde Crone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,826
Default

Herpes was not a known STD back then!!!

The word Herpes means blister. Herpes simplex is chicken pox, Herpes zoster is shingles.

The man was in hospital with blisters of unknown origin. Presumably the medics would have recognised either chicken pox or shingles, so the man just had blisters, possibly an allergic reaction to something.

Anyway, whatever it was, it was not genital herpes.
No one is hospitalised for genital herpes even today as there is no treatment and no cure...and men rarely have any signs or symptoms.

OC
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 17-03-10, 23:01
peppie peppie is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 113
Default

Oc It's not one of my direct ancestors but I wont resist a chance to wind the other half up

already have the Royal Artillery archives gagging for me to bring his history down to them . ( I have already over 40 pages of records when he signed up with the RA) trying to tie up loose ends before I book the appointment

He's keft some great trails of his not so honest career
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:19.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.