Help - DNA match and a Wingfield conundrum again

Originally Posted by Merry

The Ann who died in 1860 was only 23 though, so not sure she fits well

This Emma Wingfield gives a birth year of 1857 its possible.

I would have liked them to name the 'Gentleman' Ann was living with at the time of her death.

[Merry]

But don't you need Ann to be older to fit with your Ann?

Maybe I've missed the point, having perhaps not fully digested the whole thread!

[Merry]

Originally Posted by maggie_4_7

This Emma Wingfield gives a birth year of 1857 its possible.

I would have liked them to name the 'Gentleman' Ann was living with at the time of her death.

Maybe, if you are very lucky, he registered the death.

Originally Posted by Merry

Maybe, if you are very lucky, he registered the death.

No the coroner did.


http://www.genealogistsforum.co.uk/f...ad.php?t=29006

Thread about Sarah Wingfield's children:

http://www.genealogistsforum.co.uk/f...arah+Wingfield

[Merry]

Oh, I didn't realise there was another thread. I wondered how this Ann suddenly appeared without explanation! I get it now!

Originally Posted by Merry

Oh, I didn't realise there was another thread. I wondered how this Ann suddenly appeared without explanation! I get it now!

The Wingfields drive me nuts.

[Phoenix]

Best Mate's London lot tend to shack up with someone, register births under the father's surname, move on to a new partner and the next child is called something different.

[Phoenix]

Originally Posted by Merry

The Ann who died in 1860 was only 23 though, so not sure she fits well

That's the burial day. She was born and bp 1834, and buried aged 26.

[Merry]

lol when I was typing that I thought, "Oh, was that her age or the burial date, shall I go back and look? No!..... It will be right!!"

[Phoenix]

Thanks for posting those two links.

Remind me,

Emma Ann Palmer... does she disappear when Emma Wingfield does appear? She is the right age, and seems to be born in the right area.