Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Members' Direct Ancestors > Take One 3xGreat-Grandparent

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 23-04-11, 09:52
maggie_4_7
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I think there are two Thomas and Ann Yeowells floating about!

Edit: What is the last census you have both Thomas and Ann on? Who is your ancestor descdended from Thomas and Ann Yeowell?

Last edited by maggie_4_7; 23-04-11 at 10:51.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 23-04-11, 14:33
Sue at the seaside Sue at the seaside is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Dorset
Posts: 411
Default

What a minefield! Thanks so much for giving me loads to think about. I'll review everything later. I do remember the Ann Green thing, can't remember why I didn't think she was mine.

I'll be back later, got to go out.

Thanks so much for looking at this
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 23-04-11, 22:21
Sue at the seaside Sue at the seaside is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Dorset
Posts: 411
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maggie_4_7 View Post
I think there are two Thomas and Ann Yeowells floating about!

Edit: What is the last census you have both Thomas and Ann on? Who is your ancestor descdended from Thomas and Ann Yeowell?
There is most definately 2 families with the same name!

In 1871 Thomas and Ann are at 40 Gloucester St

In 1881 Ann is a widow and living as a boarder at 37 Gloster St, so that would make it look that the death you found could be the Ann Green. Ive found the other Thomas's death on freeBMD (not on ancestry!!!!) as 1868

Our line goes though their daughter Mary Ann b 1832 in Bethnal Green

Last edited by Sue at the seaside; 23-04-11 at 23:12.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 23-04-11, 22:45
Sue at the seaside Sue at the seaside is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Dorset
Posts: 411
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Asa View Post
Sorry Sue, I meant on the marriage of Thomas & Ann - it looks like the witness could be Robert Foot

I understood what you meant, but where have you seen this? all I can find on Ancestry is the record of the banns. The actual marriage would be a real gem!

I'm not sure I have any real evidence that Ann Foot is the wife rather than Ann Green, BUT Ann Foot married Thomas in 1829, their first child was born in 1830, the next 1832, and the next 1834. Ann Green didn't marry her Thomas Yeowell until 1835. That was my logic.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 24-04-11, 05:14
Asa Asa is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,301
Default

Sue - they're helpfully transcribed as Thomas Sparvell and Anne Hoot

http://search.ancestry.co.uk/iexec?h...c=&pid=6187771
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 24-04-11, 05:38
Asa Asa is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,301
Default

So the Thomas and Ann Yeowell in Hackney 1851 - Class: HO107; Piece: 1505; Folio: 315; Page: 35 - are not yours. He's 30 years older than his Ann and the children's births would all be post 1835 so she's Ann Green.

Yours are the other ones, who are in Bethnal Green. Piece: 1539; Folio: 552; Page: 24 - they have the children all born before 1835.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 24-04-11, 07:23
maggie_4_7
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I think that may be your Thomas' burial then but not Ann. He's address is given as Gloucester Street, Hackney Road. Are you able to see the image?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 24-04-11, 07:34
Asa Asa is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,301
Default

That must be right, Maggie - the 1868 burial is for the older Thomas born c1780 in Chertsey who married Ann Green
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 24-04-11, 07:39
Asa Asa is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,301
Default

Ah, the two Thomases are father and son aren't they? The older Thomas marries Mary Macer in 1803 in Shoreditch, son Thomas is baptised 1804 in Rotherhithe. The younger Thomas marries Ann Foot in Spitalfields in 1829. His mother Mary is buried in Hackney in 1833 and Thomas senior marries Ann Green in 1835.

Is that right?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 24-04-11, 08:06
maggie_4_7
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

errr there's another Thomas and Ann floating about in Hackney other than those two! So it's confusing but it might be you're right about that Thomas and Sue's Thomas' relationship.

Sue's - occupation printer/compositor:

http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin...057a3301945359

and another lot occupation Labourer/Bricklayer.

http://search.ancestry.co.uk/cgi-bin...057a3301945359

Edit actually that's your one but I'm sure there's another lot... I am getting confused

I have found a Robert Foot on census married to a Dinah about the same age as Ann but I can't link any baptisms between a Robert and Ann.

Last edited by maggie_4_7; 24-04-11 at 08:12.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
to3g23


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:35.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.