Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Research Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 15-05-10, 07:10
Muggins in Sussex
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default 3-Year Old Scholar

I noticed that one of my "relatives", a 3 year old girl, is described in 1881 as a "scholar".

Was this usual, if it is not a mistake?

Father was a tin-plate worker.

The family lived next door to a school - might that have something to do with it?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 15-05-10, 08:04
Olde Crone Olde Crone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,823
Default

A mistake I suspect.

I have a number of instances of very young children being described as scholars when I know the family didn't have two ha'pennies to rub together and if anything, the child was working somewhere.

Once the compulsory education act came into force, people were anxious to declare that their children were at school even when they weren't and I think the lines got a bit blurred - better say they were scholars to be on the safe side!

OC
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 15-05-10, 08:08
Muggins in Sussex
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks OC - that makes sense
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 15-05-10, 09:04
garstonite's Avatar
garstonite garstonite is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: garston liverpool
Posts: 1,089
Default

Thanks...I`ve seen that a couple of times and often wondered....with the education explanation , it makes sense now.....cheers...allan
__________________
ALLAN
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 15-05-10, 09:36
Kit's Avatar
Kit Kit is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,716
Default

lol. I always thought they'd just written scholar one time too many.
__________________
Toni
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 15-05-10, 10:04
HarrysMum's Avatar
HarrysMum HarrysMum is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 3,195
Default

I have a 3 year old scholar as well, but she 'sort of' was.

Her mother had died and the older sister used to take her to school with her.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 15-05-10, 10:38
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,302
Default

There were lots of three-year olds who went to school. I've been working on the London School Admissions records that we're indexing for ancestry's World Archives Project and there are lots of three-year-olds starting school on there.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 15-05-10, 10:44
Nell's Avatar
Nell Nell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,480
Default

I have found the majority of 3 year olds + in censuses from about 1891 onwards are listed as scholars. In some cases they've been ditto'ed as elder siblings, but younger ones have had scholar crossed off, so making it clear the 3 year olds were scholars, if you see what I mean.

My Mum went to a local village school and said that 3-year olds would often be taken in to be minded to help out mothers. This was in the 1930s, but I guess such things would have happened earlier. Victorians and Edwardians didn't have Montessori nurseries or playgroups as we know them today, so a school would have catered for children old enough to leave their mothers and ready to mix with more children and begin a more formal education.
__________________
Love from Nell
researching
Chowns in Buckinghamshire & Oxfordshire
Brewer, Broad, Eplett & Pope in Cornwall
Smoothy & Willsher/Wiltshire in Essex & Surrey
Emms, Mealing + variants, Purvey & Williams in Gloucestershire
Barnes, Dunt, Gray, Massingham, Saul/Seals/Sales in Norfolk
Matthews & Nash in Warwickshire
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 16-05-10, 12:09
anne fraser's Avatar
anne fraser anne fraser is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 538
Default

I have a picture of my grandmother as a pupil teacher at the village school in Stanton Drew about 1896 and many of the children look about three. I am not sure when five became the accepted age to start school but I suspect that many children started earlier so they could leave at about twelve.

My husband's aunt who was born in 1897 and was the eldest of thirteen children could remember having to take the youngest children to school and look after them. I suspect that many of the scholars actually were at school.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:57.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.