Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Research Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-01-10, 13:38
Margaret in Burton's Avatar
Margaret in Burton Margaret in Burton is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Burton upon Trent, Staffordshire
Posts: 5,172
Default Hmm - Don't think this woman can add up

1911 census. I was looking for a Harriet Burton. Finally found her as Mrs H Burton. She has signed as Harriet.

Her husband is not present, he wasn't in 1901 either although I have found the marriage in 1894

It states that she has been married 19 years and had 5 children, that is crossed out to read 4. It then says that 3 are still living and 2 are dead. On that census she has 9 children.

She has been married 17 years so is obviously covering for the fact the eldest was born out of wedlock and was on the 1901 census in her maiden name.

Obviously didn't understand the question.

Husband must have been around at some point to have all of those children


Here it is

__________________
Marg
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-01-10, 14:00
Merry's Avatar
Merry Merry is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Christchurch, Dorset
Posts: 21,311
Default

Is that two different handwritings?

Maybe she had some children with her husband (four or five) and the rest are the milkman's? Hence husband left!
__________________
Merry

"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-01-10, 14:07
Merry's Avatar
Merry Merry is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Christchurch, Dorset
Posts: 21,311
Default

What has her landlord done with his wife in 1901? All looks a bit dodgy to me!! lol
__________________
Merry

"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-01-10, 14:38
Margaret in Burton's Avatar
Margaret in Burton Margaret in Burton is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Burton upon Trent, Staffordshire
Posts: 5,172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Merry View Post
Is that two different handwritings?

Maybe she had some children with her husband (four or five) and the rest are the milkman's? Hence husband left!
Could be. Maybe they vary a little.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Merry View Post
What has her landlord done with his wife in 1901? All looks a bit dodgy to me!! lol
I thought that.
__________________
Marg
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-01-10, 14:49
Margaret in Burton's Avatar
Margaret in Burton Margaret in Burton is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Burton upon Trent, Staffordshire
Posts: 5,172
Default

This is her signature.

The H for Harriet is the same as in Harry



__________________
Marg
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-01-10, 14:51
Olde Crone Olde Crone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,823
Default

I agree, it looks like two different handwritings. The first looks quite childish writing.

I wonder if one of her children started to fill it in, then she realised she might have to answer their embarrassing questions about the sums, lol, and finished it herself?

OC
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-01-10, 15:00
Margaret in Burton's Avatar
Margaret in Burton Margaret in Burton is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Burton upon Trent, Staffordshire
Posts: 5,172
Default

Pure guesswork but I may have found her husband in 1911.

There is a Harry Burton (John Henry?) lodging with Andrew Moore and family in Bosworth Street, Measham, Leicestershire.
Measham is very close to Ashby de la Zouch.
I also found one of Harriets relatives yesterday in Bosworth Street, Measham.

Harry is 56, an engineer/ wheelright and was born in Manchester. He is also married.

RG14PN19056 RG78PN1140 RD404 SD1 ED4 SN184
__________________
Marg
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-01-10, 15:25
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,302
Default

The numbers of children are only for children "of the marriage", so I would guess that means the younger children weren't her husband's and therefore not included in the totals.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-01-10, 15:27
Margaret in Burton's Avatar
Margaret in Burton Margaret in Burton is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Burton upon Trent, Staffordshire
Posts: 5,172
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiterunner View Post
The numbers of children are only for children "of the marriage", so I would guess that means the younger children weren't her husband's and therefore not included in the totals.
Yes that had crossed my mind Kate
__________________
Marg
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-01-10, 18:47
samesizedfeet's Avatar
samesizedfeet samesizedfeet is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 738
Default

Unless........... she actually had 54 and the enumerator assumed she'd got it wrong and crossed out the 5
__________________
. Zoe ..

~~ May your House be free from tigers ~~

Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:05.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.