Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Research Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 21-12-20, 08:20
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,639
Default

Are they both recorded in GRO, Bev? I wonder whether the RC ceremony included a civil ceremony.

Today, some religions will have a civil ceremony on one day, and a religious ceremony on another.
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 21-12-20, 08:36
Merry's Avatar
Merry Merry is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Christchurch, Dorset
Posts: 21,283
Default

The Catholic marriage doesn't seem to be in the GRO index. I looked at the one before and after and they don't show either. The one before (July 1918) has a GRO ref for Q1 1918, same as the Kelly/Shaw marriage, but the entry after (also July) doesn't have any GRO record in 1918.
__________________
Merry

"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 21-12-20, 08:44
Macbev's Avatar
Macbev Macbev is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 212
Default

There is a Joseph Kelly/ Shaw marriage listed:
Q1 1918; RD: Liverpool; vol:8b;page #:87
https://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/...=successSource


Darn - I'm being an echo again. That would be the C/E marriage I guess. Perhaps RC marriages didn't ;count' then. I know when my fellow married his girl in a RC ceremony in Brisbane, it didn't show up in the official records. He got married again in Barracks a year later....and as the first son was born a couple of days later, I always assumed it was a shotgun affair. It took a fellow genealogist to unearth the earlier wedding.
Joseph seems to have done the dual marriage bit in reverse. Perhaps the first one to satisfy the Establishment and the second one to appease the family
__________________
http://genealogistsforum.co.uk/forum/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=214&dateline=12521662  50

Last edited by Macbev; 21-12-20 at 08:49.
Reply With Quote
  #74  
Old 21-12-20, 08:51
Macbev's Avatar
Macbev Macbev is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 212
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phoenix View Post
Are they both recorded in GRO, Bev? I wonder whether the RC ceremony included a civil ceremony.

Today, some religions will have a civil ceremony on one day, and a religious ceremony on another.

Yes - but these two ceremonies are months apart .
__________________
http://genealogistsforum.co.uk/forum/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=214&dateline=12521662  50
Reply With Quote
  #75  
Old 21-12-20, 09:36
Merry's Avatar
Merry Merry is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Christchurch, Dorset
Posts: 21,283
Default

Quote:
Perhaps RC marriages didn't ;count' then.
The RC marriages certainly should be in the GRO indexes and I have seen other people have two ceremonies (Cof E and RC) and both are listed. At the start of civil registration a registrar would have been required to attend an RC marriage, but I don't know when/if that changed.
__________________
Merry

"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
Reply With Quote
  #76  
Old 21-12-20, 11:22
Cooper70 Cooper70 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 24
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macbev View Post
John Kelly, s/o John Kelly & Mary Brophy, married Catharine Golding 9 Jan 1916 at St Mary Highfield St Liverpool


https://www.ancestry.com/imageviewer...175?pId=809868


It seems to be a descendant of this branch of the family that has a public tree on Ancestry' although they do not have all of the children shown


https://www.ancestry.com/family-tree...10074576/facts
I have had a look at this and they do not mention an Agnes who I know for sure existed.
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 21-12-20, 11:25
Merry's Avatar
Merry Merry is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Christchurch, Dorset
Posts: 21,283
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cooper70 View Post
I have had a look at this and they do not mention an Agnes who I know for sure existed.
Lots of people don't bother about adding all the side branches to their trees or at least if they upload a tree to ancestry they don't include everything, so I wouldn't worry about it!
__________________
Merry

"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 21-12-20, 12:30
Macbev's Avatar
Macbev Macbev is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 212
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cooper70 View Post
I have had a look at this and they do not mention an Agnes who I know for sure existed.

The tree doesn't mention Patrick either. It might be worth your while to contact the tree owner just to compare notes. At least this tree seems to be well sourced, not like so many which are products of wishful thinking and heated imaginations
__________________
http://genealogistsforum.co.uk/forum/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=214&dateline=12521662  50
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 21-12-20, 17:22
Cooper70 Cooper70 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 24
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macbev View Post
The tree doesn't mention Patrick either. It might be worth your while to contact the tree owner just to compare notes. At least this tree seems to be well sourced, not like so many which are products of wishful thinking and heated imaginations
Thank you have sent a message to the owner. All of you have been such big helps.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:18.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.