|
#1
12-06-14, 19:07
|
||||
|
||||
second opinion please
I received photocopies from Dublin today concerning my son in laws Dyer family
http://www.genealogistsforum.co.uk/f...ad.php?t=20228 I think this marriage record says minor for both of them, but does it? Arthur Dyer according to the 1901 and 1911 census was born 1897/1898. it's the right family as the address is the same as on the 1911 census. How can he be a minor in 1923 if he was born then? I can't find a birth reg for him, there is a male Dyer born Dec qtr 1897 in Dublin vol 2 page 482 Army record has him as 19 and a half on 7 Oct 1919, same address. Could it be he just didn't have a clue how old he was? 
__________________
Marg 
|
|
#2
12-06-14, 19:13
|
||||
|
||||
|
It definitely says Minor for Frances but I'm not certain what it says for Arthur. Can't think of another word that would fit though.
|
|
#3
12-06-14, 20:30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Marg
|
|
#4
15-06-14, 10:13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well I think the same as KiteRunner & Marg. It doesn't look like "minor" but it doesn't look like "full age" either, which I imagine would be the only other alternative.
__________________
Love from Nell researching Chowns in Buckinghamshire & Oxfordshire Brewer, Broad, Eplett & Pope in Cornwall Smoothy & Willsher/Wiltshire in Essex & Surrey Emms, Mealing + variants, Purvey & Williams in Gloucestershire Barnes, Dunt, Gray, Massingham, Saul/Seals/Sales in Norfolk Matthews & Nash in Warwickshire
|
|
#5
15-06-14, 11:48
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think the first two letter are FU but I can't read the rest.
|
|
#6
15-06-14, 17:57
|
||||
|
||||
|
Doesn't look like 'minor' for him. Not found a viable alternative yet though. Working on it.
__________________
"Keep your dreams as clean as silver" John Stewart 1939 - 2008
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
