Hannah Pinkard

[Merry]

The 1808 Hannah can be ruled out because she would have been 14 when married

If she was a baby at baptism.

I wouldn't rule her out completely until I had seen the baptism or at least a full transcript of it, but I do agree that at first glance it would appear she is the child of the couple who married the year before.

Years ago I ruled someone out for similar reasons, but had I seen the bap I would have discovered she was 15 at baptism! (It took me about ten years to rule her back in!)