#1
|
||||
|
||||
Relationships
Not really had chance to look at much today but how do Ancestry work out relationships?
A second cousin once removed who I made contact with via GR years ago is listed as a 4th cousin. My first cousins son who is my first cousin once removed is listed as my 2nd cousin and to my daughters a 3rd cousin when he is actually their 2nd cousin.
__________________
Marg |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
You have 50% DNA from father and 50% from mother but (in theory at least) you could have 50% DNA from paternal grandfather and 0% from paternal grandmother.
Ancestry is only saying what the likely relationship is, not what it actually is. Sib's child is more closely related to some people than I am - which doesn't seem fair! - and makes a mockery of relationships.
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
It's just an estimate of the relationship based on the amount of shared DNA, Marg.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks. I understand now
__________________
Marg |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
If you look at your thru lines you will see a more accurate relationship based on submitted trees.
On the ordinary dna part it says my son is a 2nd cousin to his half aunt but on thru lines its correct as a half aunt. However that is on the presumption that the trees are correct. Have found person who has made a connection to a Lord c1800 but I haven't found anything that even possibly confirms that - wishful thinking I think.
__________________
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Marg |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux |
|
|