Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Family History Photographs > Photo Restoration

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 26-05-11, 10:31
tenterfieldjulie
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Catherine Bryant - Probably Ballarat Vic.

This photo belonged to my father's mother's mother.
It is 4 inches long by 2 1/2 inches wide. It is original but very poor faces.
I would really appreciate if it could be improved at all. Thank you. Julie

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-06-11, 15:24
Rachel's Avatar
Rachel Rachel is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 737
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tenterfieldjulie View Post
This photo belonged to my father's mother's mother.
It is 4 inches long by 2 1/2 inches wide. It is original but very poor faces.
I would really appreciate if it could be improved at all. Thank you. Julie
Hi Julie
Are you able to scan it again ?

It is horribly pixellated because of the small file size.
If you can, then please rescan at either

A resolution of 600 DPI with the scale set at 100%

or

A resolution of 300 DPI with the scale set at more than 100% ~ try 200 but watch the file size doesn't get so huge that it wont upload.
__________________
Rachel
FOR PHOTO RESTORATIONS, PLEASE SCAN AT 300-600 dpi AND AT LEAST 100% SCALE.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-06-11, 08:28
tenterfieldjulie
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi Rachel, Many thanks for your interest. My scanner works on PPI so I hope it is the same as DPI. The first image is 600 ppi and it was 100% but then it said it was too large and so I clicked on a default setting. One image has been slightly enhanced (the darker one). The second image is 300 ppi and is not enhanced. Not sure if possible for anyone to improve because they are pretty poor quality.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-06-11, 09:53
Rachel's Avatar
Rachel Rachel is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 737
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tenterfieldjulie View Post
Hi Rachel, Many thanks for your interest. My scanner works on PPI so I hope it is the same as DPI. The first image is 600 ppi and it was 100% but then it said it was too large and so I clicked on a default setting. One image has been slightly enhanced (the darker one). The second image is 300 ppi and is not enhanced. Not sure if possible for anyone to improve because they are pretty poor quality.

Hiya
Both images show as being at a resolution of 200.
The second one is marginally better (1.16M instead of 1.01M) but still pixellated and with that kind of fading around the heads, the detail can not be worked on.
I'll PM you my email address so you don't have to go through Photobucket and hopefully a larger file size will show more detail.
__________________
Rachel
FOR PHOTO RESTORATIONS, PLEASE SCAN AT 300-600 dpi AND AT LEAST 100% SCALE.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-06-11, 10:46
tenterfieldjulie
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks Rachel. I will send it through to you, but I'm afraid that the fading/fuzziness around the faces is on the originals, so I don't think that can be improved. My scanner is a HP Scanjet G4010 and it scans slides and negatives. I will need to find the instruction booklet as I usually scan from a button on the scanner and in order to increase the scale I think I need to go through the computer. What I hope can be done is take the big black mark off the lady's face. If not possible many thanks for your interest. Julie
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-06-11, 18:23
Rachel's Avatar
Rachel Rachel is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 737
Default

Yes it can be improved and the black mark can be removed .... BUT with that amount of pixellation, the features are obscured when enlarged on the computer screen.

Meanwhile, you could try emailing me both your scans so I can see what they look like without Photobucket's interference.

It may be that Photobucket has compressed them ~ they both show the resolution being at 200
__________________
Rachel
FOR PHOTO RESTORATIONS, PLEASE SCAN AT 300-600 dpi AND AT LEAST 100% SCALE.

Last edited by Rachel; 05-06-11 at 18:29.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-06-11, 22:56
tenterfieldjulie
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks Rachel. I really appreciate your help. I'm rushing to have breakfast and get to work so I will see what I can manage this afternoon. Please only when convenient.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-06-11, 23:07
Rachel's Avatar
Rachel Rachel is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 737
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tenterfieldjulie View Post
Thanks Rachel. I really appreciate your help. I'm rushing to have breakfast and get to work so I will see what I can manage this afternoon. Please only when convenient.
OK no problem
Slow down ~ more haste less speed
__________________
Rachel
FOR PHOTO RESTORATIONS, PLEASE SCAN AT 300-600 dpi AND AT LEAST 100% SCALE.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:11.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.