#31
|
||||
|
||||
Well, if your researcher thought they were called Garlick and the person with the submitted entries thought they were Whittaker, then I think the best move might be for someone else to look at the PRs once and for all, to see EXACTLY what is said (and for the Devenport ones).
I can't imagine why they went back to Hollinwood, but the death notice in the paper ties in with the bap of Elizabeth. I wonder if she was buried there? (I guess so, as it's unlikely the submitter would have made the connection otherwise). Erm are you going to ask the registrar about that birth cert for Jane ALice in1839? If the parents are Wm and Elizabeth you will have a maiden name to go on!
__________________
Merry "Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010 |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Just in case you thought it was all sewn up, who's this
Jane Garlick bp 25 Jun 1815, Collegiate, Manchester, d/o William Garlick, painter and Elizabeth, of Salford. Has to be a red herring, surely, William and Elizabeth were only 16 in 1815! OC EDIT Unfortunately, Hollinwood regs aren't available through the IGI. I will have to see if I can bully my brother (again) or find my bit of paper....I suspect the submitted ones were submitted by a Whittaker descendant, probably the ones in SA, who would only know the family as whittaker and would think that Garlick was a funny middle name...or maybe they submitted as Whittaker for ease of continuity! OC Last edited by Olde Crone; 08-01-11 at 21:46. |
#33
|
||||
|
||||
*ignores first bit of last post*
At great personal effort, I have got up from the sofa and gone into a coldroom to switch on the desktop computer which has the NBI disk in the coffee cup holder. I found these: Elizabeth Whittaker aged 11 months bur 7th (month illegible) 1833 Jane Alice Elizabeth Whittaker aged 2 bur 16th July 1841 Fits with: Deaths Sep 1841 GARLICK Jane Alice Elizabeth Manchester 20 345 Elizabeth Whittaker aged 78 bur 8th April 1878 which fits with: Deaths Jun 1878 WHITTAKER Elizabeth 78 Chorlton 8c 388 and William Whittaker aged 54 bur 10th Aug 1854 which fits with the Garlick death reg posted yesterday!
__________________
Merry "Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010 |
#34
|
||||
|
||||
lol forgot to say all those burials are at Hollinwood!
__________________
Merry "Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010 |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Oh thankyou and well done, hope you had a thick cardi on!
They lost an awful lot of children, didn't they. There's a suspicious gap in the births, not many in the 1820s and those all die except Edward. Arsenic/lead poisoning, perhaps! OC |
#36
|
||||
|
||||
Hmmm..... I suppose all the Elizabeth's (ie Wm's wife) on the baps were the same woman?
I will have another check of the burials tomorrow, as I only searched for certain ones. Also forgot to check Garlick! lol
__________________
Merry "Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010 |
#37
|
||||
|
||||
The Hollinwood Whittaker baps are on the FS pilot site. I clicked the button that says 'about these records' and amongst other things it states:
Record Description The index is an electronic database of information transcribed from original records. I'm going to type out the baps here (everything that is Wm and Eliz Whittaker) in the right order and without duplicates, as I get confused otherwise: 27th May 1821 Helena Devenport 28th July 1822 Edward ....................(with Wm and Eliz, named Edmund Garlick, in 1841) 14th Oct 1827 Eleanor Devenport 14th Mar 1830 William .....................(bap is listed under Garlick on FS pilot, father Wm Whittaker G mother Eliz. With Wm and Eliz 1841) 11th Dec 1831 Mary 18th May 1832 Elizabeth 14th Dec 1834 Thomas Henry ...........(with Wm and Eliz, named Edmund Garlick, in 1841) 8th Feb 1835 James 22nd Jan 1837 John 6th Oct 1839 Jane Alice Elisabeth .....(with Wm and Eliz, named Edmund Garlick, in 1841) So, some of them are very close together! There are no Garlick baptisms (Wm and Eliz) As I said, I'll look at the burials again tomorrow.
__________________
Merry "Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010 |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Ah, a few there I don't have.
I have Edward born 2 June 1823, baptised 28 July 1823, s/o William Whittaker and BETTY, a painter of Tinker Lane. Don't forget, there is another William Whittaker around, with a wife Elizabeth/Betty, so some of those could be theirs. The "other" William Whittaker was around on the 1841 census, waiting for me to pick him up thinking he was mine.... Off to bed now, cannot see straight. Thankyou so much for all your help today. OC |
#39
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Thos Whittaker Abode: Hollinwood 10th Feb 1836 Age 71 Hollinwood St Margaret There are two Alice Whittaker burials that could be his wife - both the wife of a Thomas Whittaker. One is March 1818 aged 48 and the other March 1830 aged 62.
__________________
Merry "Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010 |
#40
|
||||
|
||||
Goodnight OC.
Some of the baps were Betty and some Elizabeth, but I guess there are two couples and it may be that some of the children will never be matched with the right parents. Those two that were Devenport were one mum as Betty and one Eliz, so clearly not separate forenames!
__________________
Merry "Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010 |
Tags |
to3g9 |
|
|