|
#11
25-02-18, 11:26
|
||||
|
||||
Looks as though George and Ellen had separated by 1891:
https://www.ancestry.co.uk/interacti...nSearchResults 3 Moorside Lane, Bradford Abraham Knowles Head M 28 General labourer Yorkshire Bark Alice Do Wife M 29 Wool twister Hampshire Aldershot Sarah Jane Do Mother Wid 47 Living on own means Yorkshire Worthspur Ellen Ellis Sister M 30 Wool drawer Do Batley Carr Edith Ann Knowles Sister 11 Doffer Worsted Mills Do Bradford Harry Ellis Nephew 10 Scholar Do Do William Beetles Father in Law Widr 69 Time keeper Hunts Ellington James H Beetles Brother in Law S 18 Pawnbrokers Apprentice Yks Newlay. Henry is also with Abraham Knowles and family in 1901, but Ellen isn't with them: https://www.ancestry.co.uk/interacti...nSearchResults I was thinking that if Ellen was still alive in 1901, George and Mary wouldn't have been able to marry each other. But I haven't managed to figure out what happened to Ellen yet! 
|
|
#12
25-02-18, 12:10
|
||||
|
||||
|
As well as the birth reg for Catherine J Ellis there is this one:
ELLIS, HANNAH mmn DIGGLE GRO Reference: 1902 D Quarter in BRADFORD Volume 09B Page 46 who most likely died in 1903 Q2 and was not included in the original figures for the 1911 census for Mary E Barley.
__________________
"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
|
|
#13
26-02-18, 16:05
|
||||
|
||||
|
Very interesting, if Hannah was Mary Ellen's daughter then why did she say she had only had 2 children in 1911? Her using her mother's maiden name for her children in 1911 is also very odd, maybe she was hiding from George? An interesting problem, although I am only really concerned about Fred, who was my relative. Thanks for the help
__________________
Lynn
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
