Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Research Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 25-04-20, 08:13
Qwackers Qwackers is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: over wyre coast
Posts: 1,243
Default

Hi ,i thought she could be born in in 1765/66as it would have made her 20 or 19 .
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 25-04-20, 08:16
Qwackers Qwackers is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: over wyre coast
Posts: 1,243
Default

we are talking about ann married in 1885 , her birth is 1765 , i think we are getting mixed up somewhere . The clan calland are looking at her birth .
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 25-04-20, 08:26
Merry's Avatar
Merry Merry is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Christchurch, Dorset
Posts: 21,283
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Qwackers View Post
we are talking about ann married in 1885 , her birth is 1765 , i think we are getting mixed up somewhere . The clan calland are looking at her birth .
1785 not 1885.

Yes, sorry I went from the date you gave in your first post today which says:

Quote:
she is saying the only one that firsts is a one in Calne wiltshire In 1775
So, you should have said 1765. I didn't notice the actual date was 10 years earlier because I was fed up with being taken on a wild goose chase to Wiltshire when she was probably born in Lancashire.

Anyway the Calne girl died in 1774, so forget her.
__________________
Merry

"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 25-04-20, 08:58
Qwackers Qwackers is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: over wyre coast
Posts: 1,243
Default

will explain to them , that shes out of the picture , and like you said it may be one of those things that we may never find her true birth . as long as they know . i think they should look closer to lancashire . But that's up to them .
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 26-04-20, 06:21
Qwackers Qwackers is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: over wyre coast
Posts: 1,243
Default

Hi ,was checking the births on family search without a first name , and came across a birth reg in Wigan , for a mary Lea ,base daughter of elizabeth 1776 abode scholes , it's a stab in the dark , but mother Betty could be a elizabeth , and Mary could be a mary ann . Scholes is approx three or four miles from Haigh , which is a higher end of Wigan . What are your thoughts on possibilities ? thanks
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 26-04-20, 07:02
Merry's Avatar
Merry Merry is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Christchurch, Dorset
Posts: 21,283
Default

But her father is Thomas Lea, according to post #13. Also a baptism in 1776 is too late isn't it? (making her aged 9 at her marriage)

You don't mention whether you have managed to eliminate all the baptisms I suggested in post #25.

Of those five baptisms, I would say these two are the most promising:

Baptism: 19 Sep 1762 St Peter, Bolton, Lancashire, England
Ann Lee - Daughter of Thos. Lee & Betty
Abode: Turton
Source: LDS Family Search

Baptism: 6 Feb 1767 St Mary the Virgin, Leigh, Lancashire, England
Ann Lee - Daughter of Thomas Lee
Abode: Bedford
Register: Baptisms 1757 - 1769, Page 110
Source: LDS Film 1885648

If she is the first of these then she would be about 23 at the marriage in 1785. Bolton le Moors is under 10 miles from Wigan. The mother is recorded and she has the right first name.

The second baptism above, she would have been a minor at the marriage, which isn't mentioned, so perhaps less promising. Leigh is a couple of miles nearer to Wigan. From that baptism we don't know the name of Ann's mother.

However, I have not attempted to eliminate any of the baptisms I've suggested in post #25. Perhaps you could confirm if you have been able to discount any of them.
__________________
Merry

"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 26-04-20, 10:04
Qwackers Qwackers is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: over wyre coast
Posts: 1,243
Default

hi , I looked at the first baptism and that doesn't look too bad parents are correct . Turton abode is just outside of Bolton . Haigh being about 9 miles away . so it is a possibility.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 26-04-20, 10:14
Merry's Avatar
Merry Merry is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Christchurch, Dorset
Posts: 21,283
Default

So you need to look at burials and marriages in Bolton and surrounds to see if there's a possibility of Ann dying or marrying there which would eliminate her.

Do you have a burial age for your Ann? Do you know when she had her last child?
__________________
Merry

"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 26-04-20, 10:28
Qwackers Qwackers is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: over wyre coast
Posts: 1,243
Default

hi ,sorry ,i've no idea ,but will check what you've mentioned later to see if i can eliminate her thanks
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 26-04-20, 10:58
Qwackers Qwackers is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: over wyre coast
Posts: 1,243
Default

hi I have found her last son Robert She had him in 1800
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:57.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.