|
#1
29-03-23, 09:30
|
|||
|
|||
Lost Cousins newsletter - late Mar 2023
__________________
|
|
#2
29-03-23, 10:24
|
||||
|
||||
|
The ref to 'identical twins' made me smile! Just because they were both girls doesn't preclude them being fraternal! Also a common surname like Barker could mean they were not even related.
__________________
"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
|
|
#3
29-03-23, 13:32
|
|||
|
|||
|
Merry, I was at school with twins, fraternal girls. Weirdly, they had identical twin brothers. One girl went on to have boy/girl twins. And you are right - I once found what I thought were twins, same page ref but baptisms showed different mother's maiden names.
OC
|
|
#4
29-03-23, 13:40
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ha! OC, your post made me want to go the extra mile and guess what? Not even twins!!
BARKER, MARTHA ELLEN mmn NORTON GRO Reference: 1873 S Quarter in NANTWICH Volume 08A Page 321 BARKER, MARY ANN mmn MALSHAW GRO Reference: 1873 S Quarter in NANTWICH Volume 08A Page 321
__________________
"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
|
|
#5
29-03-23, 16:43
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lol! I'm saying nothing.....
OC
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
