Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Research Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 27-02-17, 13:20
Ann from Sussex's Avatar
Ann from Sussex Ann from Sussex is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,417
Default More help needed with deciphering Latin please

Following on from Mary in Italy's plea for help deciphering Latin....can anyone help with a note on my gt aunt's Catholic baptismal entry please? Here is the Findmypast link to the image:

http://search.findmypast.co.uk/recor...hlights=%22%22

The entry concerned is number 493 on the page for the baptism of Catharina Maria Lalley of 31 Dorset Street. I am having trouble reading the note scribbled under the address, some of which, I think, consists of abbreviated words. This is what I think at least some of it says:

"Privatum ob peric mater cam---a supplit a die 28th October 1888"

The last bit is obviously the date on which whatever it was took place. At first I thought "mater" said "mortes", suggesting a death/burial....except that this child grew up, married and had children of her own. She was my Mum's Auntie Kitty who I have heard stories of so I know she didn't die as a baby.

I have tried translating what I think it says online but just come up with gobbledy gook. My friend has a cousin who is a Catholic priest and she is prepared to ask him what it means IF I can decipher it.

My best guess is that it refers to some kind of ceremony concerning my gt grandmother after the birth. Not being Roman Catholic myself, I have no idea what that might be.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 27-02-17, 14:25
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,652
Default

in periculo mortis

The above phrase means in danger of dying, so I assume it was justifying the private baptism - happily unnecessary!
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 27-02-17, 14:29
ElizabethHerts ElizabethHerts is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 9,293
Default

Born 27th day of the month of July 1888
Baptised 7th day of the month of October 1888
Catharine Mary Lalley
daughter of Daniel and Mary Ann Lalley (formerly Daniels)

by me
Henry Martin (followed by two letters that look like S and I)


Godfather: William Burke
Godmother: Mary Burke


I can't read the bit on the left very well but it does look as if a death is mentioned. I'll take a closer look.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 27-02-17, 14:29
ElizabethHerts ElizabethHerts is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 9,293
Default

Yes, Phoenix is correct - it was a private baptism for a sickly child.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27-02-17, 15:02
Mary from Italy's Avatar
Mary from Italy Mary from Italy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: N. Italy
Posts: 3,733
Default

I think it says "Privatmi Ob peric. mortis Caeremoniae suppletae".

The initials after the priest's name are probably SJ, which means he was a Jesuit.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 27-02-17, 16:15
Ann from Sussex's Avatar
Ann from Sussex Ann from Sussex is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,417
Default

Thank you all. The only thing that gives me doubt about it being a private baptism for a sickly child is that the main entry shows she was baptised on 7th October and the scribbled note under the address refers to 28th October. If she had already been baptised why would they feel the need to do it again?

I wonder if it was her mother - my gt. grandmother - who was 'in danger of dying' and had a private baptism? She hadn't been born a Catholic and had been baptised in the C.o.E. She married an Irish Catholic in a parish church in London that is described as being noted for its Anglo Catholic liturgy in Victorian times....so maybe this was the moment when she was received into the Roman Catholic church? I know she did become a Catholic at some point and all her children were Catholic (my grandmother ended up rebelling and marrying an Anglican which is why my twig of the tres is C.o.E.). She didn't die then either. Kitty was her 4th child, she went on to have another 6 and died in 1939!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 27-02-17, 16:23
Olde Crone Olde Crone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,826
Default

Ann

I don't know about the RC church but in the C of E another baptismal ceremony should follow a private baptism. The second ceremony is worded slightly differently and is to receive the child into the church.

First baptism spiritual, followed by a temporal one!

OC
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 27-02-17, 16:26
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,304
Default

Could it mean that she was privately baptised on the 7th Oct and then publicly received into the church on the 28th?
Edit - snap, OC!
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 27-02-17, 16:31
Ann from Sussex's Avatar
Ann from Sussex Ann from Sussex is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,417
Default

Oh, it has just occurred to me: did the priest make the entry on 28th October about it having been a private baptism on 7th? Maybe he was just behind with his admin!

The Chapel of the Sacred Heart, Horseferry Road where this baptism took place was a Chapel of Ease -an outpost - of Westminster Cathedral. My grandmother was baptised there too. When some of the later children were born the family was living in Soho and then the children were baptised in the chapel of the Bavarian Embassy. Very exotic!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 27-02-17, 16:41
Ann from Sussex's Avatar
Ann from Sussex Ann from Sussex is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,417
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Olde Crone View Post
Ann

I don't know about the RC church but in the C of E another baptismal ceremony should follow a private baptism. The second ceremony is worded slightly differently and is to receive the child into the church.

First baptism spiritual, followed by a temporal one!

OC
Quote:
Originally Posted by kiterunner View Post
Could it mean that she was privately baptised on the 7th Oct and then publicly received into the church on the 28th?
Edit - snap, OC!
*Slaps forehead*

Yes, of course! I should have worked all that out for myself as I've come across it before. A gt grandfather on my father's side was privately baptised on the day he was born in 1840 because he wasn't expected to live and then he had a public baptism in church about 3 weeks later. I looked into the rules when I discovered that and found that...in the C.o.E. at least....a private ceremony must be followed by one in front of the congregation within a certain time frame if the child survives. He did. He died in 1920 having fathered 12 children!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:25.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.