Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > DNA Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 20-03-19, 14:48
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,298
Default

Yes, it's gone back to the old list for me too. Maybe they released it by accident! I wish I'd looked at more of them while I had the chance instead of going out shopping.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 20-03-19, 14:52
maggie_4_7
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiterunner View Post
Yes, it's gone back to the old list for me too. Maybe they released it by accident! I wish I'd looked at more of them while I had the chance instead of going out shopping.
How does it work though, it confused me.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 20-03-19, 15:48
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,298
Default

I haven't seen anything official about it, Maggie, but my guess is that whereas the list of shared matches with, say "Mr X", usually only shows people who are 4th-6th cousins or closer to both of you, it was temporarily also including people who were 4th-6th cousins or closer to you, but more distantly related to "Mr X".

I did send in some feedback while it was doing that. I suggested that it should either flag those which were only distantly related to the other person, or sort them in descending order of amount of DNA shared with the other person, though I wouldn't want it to actually show the specific amounts. But just so we would get an idea of roughly how closely they were related to the other person.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 20-03-19, 18:13
maggie_4_7
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiterunner View Post
I haven't seen anything official about it, Maggie, but my guess is that whereas the list of shared matches with, say "Mr X", usually only shows people who are 4th-6th cousins or closer to both of you, it was temporarily also including people who were 4th-6th cousins or closer to you, but more distantly related to "Mr X".

I did send in some feedback while it was doing that. I suggested that it should either flag those which were only distantly related to the other person, or sort them in descending order of amount of DNA shared with the other person, though I wouldn't want it to actually show the specific amounts. But just so we would get an idea of roughly how closely they were related to the other person.
Ahh okay thank you, it confused me.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 21-03-19, 06:36
maggie_4_7
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The shared matches list is temporarily unavailable for me so perhaps they are working on it.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 21-03-19, 09:42
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,298
Default

I saw a copy of a post from an ancestry staff member who confirmed it was including more distant matches to the other person and they said it was done by mistake and that's why it was changed back to how it was before. I quite liked it myself! Though it wouldn't be so useful if we didn't have the other list to compare it to.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 21-03-19, 10:58
maggie_4_7
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiterunner View Post
I saw a copy of a post from an ancestry staff member who confirmed it was including more distant matches to the other person and they said it was done by mistake and that's why it was changed back to how it was before. I quite liked it myself! Though it wouldn't be so useful if we didn't have the other list to compare it to.
Oh that's a shame, why change it back if it works.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 21-03-19, 11:14
Kit's Avatar
Kit Kit is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,716
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiterunner View Post
I saw a copy of a post from an ancestry staff member who confirmed it was including more distant matches to the other person and they said it was done by mistake and that's why it was changed back to how it was before. I quite liked it myself! Though it wouldn't be so useful if we didn't have the other list to compare it to.
Send in feedback and comment on the post that you like the change. It seems they are listening to feedback.
__________________
Toni
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 21-03-19, 12:28
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,298
Default

I already submitted feedback before they changed it back, Toni.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:34.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.