#11
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I wouldn't rule her out completely until I had seen the baptism or at least a full transcript of it, but I do agree that at first glance it would appear she is the child of the couple who married the year before. Years ago I ruled someone out for similar reasons, but had I seen the bap I would have discovered she was 15 at baptism! (It took me about ten years to rule her back in!)
__________________
Merry "Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010 |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Merry "Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010 |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Susannah could possibly be a mistranscription of Hannah?
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Could be, Kite - though death in 1874 gives her age as 72 & Susannah was
bap 1798. Just don't think its her somehow. Agree what you say re late baptisms Merry - I've got a few of those too. |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
I think that Susanna may have married Jesse Clare in 1824. On the 1851 census Susan Clare b 1799 in Goldington is with OH, Jesse, in Turvey, Bucks.
__________________
Merry "Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010 |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Looks like it, Merry - thanks.
|
|
|