Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Research Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 17-12-23, 20:00
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,650
Default William Tunks and Letitia Thompson

The above couple married in Brede, Sussex Monday 24 March 1800:
https://www.ancestry.co.uk/imageview...031?pId=204086


This was the day after the banns were read for the third time. Neither signed. She was a spinster, he was said to be a widower. Both were of this parish. The witnesses are not recognisable family members.


This is odd, because on January 14 1798,in Linton, Kent, James and John, the children of William and Letitia Tunks were baptised:
https://search.findmypast.co.uk/reco...229_1_a_4%2f19


On 24 May 1794, also in Linton, Eliz daughter of William and Lachester Tolks is baptised:
https://search.findmypast.co.uk/reco...229_1_a_4%2f18


On May 19 1805 in Loose, Kent David and Susanna Tunks, children of David and Letitia Tunks are baptised. They were both born the preceding April:
https://search.findmypast.co.uk/reco...FBAP%2F0309467


April 26 1807, David, son of William and Letitia Tunks aged 2 is buried in Loose:
https://search.findmypast.co.uk/reco...233_1_a_3%2f12


and 23 December 1810, William Tunks aged 73 is buried:
https://search.findmypast.co.uk/reco...233_1_a_3%2f14


14 June 1819, Elizabeth Tunks marries Samuel Brook in Linton Kent. Both otp:
https://search.findmypast.co.uk/reco...%2F0069020%2F2
Elizabeth cannot write, but the witnesses Samuel Tunks and ?Mare Maria? Tunks can.


Samuel Tunks appears to have been born 1788 from a burial entry 1821 in All Saints, Maidstone.


Given the errors in the above, following a suggestion of Merry's, many years ago, I think



William and Letitia had children:
Elizabeth 1794
James and John 1798
David and Rosannah 1805


Rosannah Tunks certainly had a sister Elizabeth b 1794, Linton. They both appear on censuses in Barming, Kent. In 1841, Rosannah, as Hannah Mason is in Stepney, staying with Henry Brook, while Elizabeth, now Bellingham is looking after Rosannah's daughter Harriott in Barming:
https://www.ancestry.co.uk/imageview...12?pId=2834786


Can anyone spot Letitia after 1805, or find Samuel Tunks' marriage or his birth, or his widow after her marriage to William Strood:
https://search.findmypast.co.uk/reco...%2F0184495%2F1
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 17-12-23, 21:47
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,301
Default

FMP has a transcription of the baptism of Sam'l Sunks 22 Jan 1792 in Sussex, son of Wm and Letitia. It doesn't say which parish as far as I can see. It is in a dataset called Sussex Baptisms.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 17-12-23, 22:02
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,301
Default

Ah, here it is on Ancestry, transcribed as Sanks:
https://www.ancestry.co.uk/imageview...ce&pId=1360592

Parish is Mountfield. The name is pretty clearly Tunks. William is a traveller.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17-12-23, 23:20
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,650
Default

A traveller indeed! Thank you, Kite! That confirms Elizabeth as being a Tunks. Looks like I have to wander through the Junks, Lunks, Funks.

At that period, I wonder whether they meant commercial traveller or gypsy?

Also wonder whether William was waiting for a first wife to die, or simply called himself a widower to account for the four (at least!) children at the wedding.
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 18-12-23, 09:06
Olde Crone Olde Crone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,823
Default

Phoenix

It meant commercial traveller back then. I have seen others at that time described as tinkers, gypsies, romanies. Traveller used to describe those groups with a nomadic lifestyle is a new one which I don't think I heard until the 1980s.

OC
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 18-12-23, 09:18
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,301
Default

I think it could be either kind of traveller.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 18-12-23, 10:09
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,301
Default

The Annals of Southport says about my 6x-g-grandparents, who died in 1786 and 1802:

They were "travellers", as is proved by the fact that at the funerals "double dues" were paid. They were dealers in rabbit skins. On their gravestone is inscribed
"I lodged have in many a town,
And travelled many a year ;
But age and death have brought me down
To my last lodging here."
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 18-12-23, 10:51
Olde Crone Olde Crone is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,823
Default

Kate, I've only seen sojourners, gypsies etc, never travellers, but of course there's always an exception. Selling rabbit skins could be either.

OC
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 18-12-23, 15:10
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,650
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Olde Crone View Post
Phoenix

It meant commercial traveller back then. I have seen others at that time described as tinkers, gypsies, romanies. Traveller used to describe those groups with a nomadic lifestyle is a new one which I don't think I heard until the 1980s.

OC
Several of the children could sign their names, which suggests they weren't gypsies. But it sounds as if they didn't want him to become a charge on the parish.
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:02.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.