#21
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Polish is written in the Latin alphabet (with the addition of a few extra accented letters), although since Poland was occupied by Russia at the time he might have had Cyrillic forced on him... either way, fluent English seems pretty unlikely. The spelling of the Ripper letter is somewhat strange, but the grammar is fine - suggesting either the usual variations in 19th century spelling (other people on here will probably know more about that than me), or someone who actually spoke perfectly good English but was misspelling words deliberately in order to give the impression the killer was illiterate.
If the letter was indeed a hoax, though, its style provides no clue at all to the identity of the murderer! The verdict from one DNA expert is pretty much the same as that which most of us have reached on here: "can't be sure until their work has been more thoroughly checked" - http://www.independent.co.uk/news/sc...e-9717036.html There's a rule of thumb in science that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence to back them up - announcing that you've solved a mystery which has had everyone else stumped for 100+ years is certainly an extraordinary claim, and the evidence Edwards is offering appears to be some distance short of being considered extraordinary. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
His native tongue was Yiddish though, not Polish, if we want to split hairs.
By the time this claim has been thoroughly discredited (if it ever is) they will have sold more than enough books for it not to matter one way or the other! OC |
|
|