Tracing Isaac - Page 4 - Genealogists' Forum

kiterunner · #31 03-08-23, 11:56

It is the supposed father William Isaac who was supposedly born in Surrey but I wouldn't bother with it, Merry. If you look at some of the trees on Ancestry you will see what I mean.

vita · #32 03-08-23, 12:00

So sorry,Merry. Was distracted by visitor arriving.
Should have full stop after 1745,& William ISaac is the one supposed to have been b Surrey,abt 1710

Merry · #33 03-08-23, 12:07

I agree Kate.

vita, none of the trees have anything whatsoever to back up the Surrey 1710 birth details for WIH or his supposed marriage in 1735 to Ellen Headland (and I don't know if he was apparently marrying a relative or if the people who 'know they married in 1735' just don't know the bride's surname?)

I would just ignore the whole thing if it were my tree.

vita · #34 03-08-23, 12:12

Thanks again,both . I wasn't getting my hopes up,but you know what it's like .....
.

Merry · #35 03-08-23, 12:23

Well there's always a chance the lady you have contacted will have some evidence that's not been passed on to any of the Ancestry tree holders!

vita · #36 03-08-23, 14:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by Merry

Well there's always a chance the lady you have contacted will have some evidence that's not been passed on to any of the Ancestry tree holders!

Yes,hope so. Just waiting for her to get back to me.