#21
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Martha born 1820 her grandparents are William Cook & Elizabeth (Betty) Kelsey Most of the info is on http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb..../PetBaps-C.htm |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Martha Cook b 1820 Sheet Hants:
I thought I had eliminated all the potential Martha's from the 1851 and 1861 census, but clearly not! lol These are her children: HUGHES, JOHN WALTER mmn COOK GRO Reference: 1862 J Quarter in SHEPPEY Volume 02A Page 644 HUGHES, ELIZABETH mmn COOK GRO Reference: 1857 D Quarter in KIDDERMINSTER Volume 06C Page 249 Here are those children with Martha and her husband, John Hughes in 1871: https://www.ancestry.co.uk/interacti...nSearchResults At the moment the problem is that Martha probably had a previous marriage so her name wasn't Cook when she married John Hughes (at least, I can't find a Cook/Hughes marriage yet). At the moment I can't find them in 1861 with dau Elizabeth.
__________________
Merry "Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010 |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I've just remembered there was another dau in that 1871 household - Mary Ann aged 20 who was married to Henry Marfleet and had been to India. Maybe she is a clue?
__________________
Merry "Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010 |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
The marriage of Mary Ann Hughes in India gave her father's name as Samuel Christopher John Hughes, so I was looking for the wrong first forename. Here is the marriage:
Marriages Mar 1849 Fisher Martha Portsea I. 7 202 Hughes Samuel Christopher John Portsea 7 202 I remember thinking I had eliminated a Martha Fisher, so I obviously did that wrong!!
__________________
Merry "Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010 |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Marriages Dec 1846
Cook Martha Portsea 7 241 Fisher John Portsea 7 241 I realise what happened now - I saw this marriage and then looked at the 1851 census where I identified a different, older, couple as being the above couple. I don't think they had any children, so I couldn't look to see if the wife's name was originally Cook. Obviously your Martha would have been a Hughes by 1851.
__________________
Merry "Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010 |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
Here they are in 1851. Martha has forgotten her birthplace!
https://www.ancestry.co.uk/interacti...nSearchResults I was reading John's service record earlier. I think they may have been overseas in 1861.
__________________
Merry "Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010 |
#28
|
||||
|
||||
See post #25
__________________
Merry "Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010 |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Let me digest this - I have to go out soon, but will get back to you.
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
OK. I'm going to bed now!
__________________
Merry "Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010 |
|
|