Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > DNA Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-11-19, 03:14
Kit's Avatar
Kit Kit is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,716
Default GEDmatch privacy

Earlier in the year there was an uproar as GEDmatch released DNA information about a person. This led GEDmatch to have an opt out policy so your DNA could not be used for crime enforcement.

However, law enforcement simply asked a judge for a warrant for ALL DNA on GEDmatch, which was granted, and GEDmatch handed it over within 24 hours without a fight.

The Detective involved in the case is hoping to find a way to access ancestry and 23andme too.

Interestingly the access did not solve the case but the detective is not looking to access other databases.

So DNA information is not as private as we would like to believe.
__________________
Toni
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-11-19, 08:24
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,617
Default

I have friends who would never provide a DNA sample. There is no guarantee that your data will be treated appropriately in the future. Terms and conditions may change, or a company be bought out by another with different ethics.

However, there was a news item today, suggesting all children be tested at birth, so that health problems can be identified early.

I imagine that in fifty years we will be unable to conceal our DNA. But it is certainly worth more to the testing companies than it is to us.
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-11-19, 10:23
Olde Crone Olde Crone is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,767
Default

This has been one of the main reasons I will not have my dna tested. Not because I have done anything wrong but because it is such a valuable thing that I do not trust any commercial company not to sell it on.

I have no concern that it is being used to solve serious crime, hip hip hooray in fact, but where do you stop using it for the greater good and who decides what the greater good is?

OC
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-11-19, 10:53
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,270
Default

It's not DNA being used to solve crime that bothers me about GEDMatch either, but the fact that anyone who knows the email address of a member, or their ID number or kit number, can access their DNA results, and it is easy to imagine bots being used to trawl the site gathering data by trying different kit numbers.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-11-19, 19:53
Janet's Avatar
Janet Janet is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Niagara County
Posts: 1,985
Default

I agree, Kite, and I'm sure if that's the case they're already trying it out.

Today's NY Times has some more of the details.
Your DNA Profile is Private? A Florida Judge Just Said Otherwise

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kit View Post
Interestingly the access did not solve the case but the detective is not looking to access other databases.
Thanks for posting, Toni. Did you mean the detective is now looking to access other databases?
__________________
My time and date


Janet (Niagara)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-11-19, 20:14
Kit's Avatar
Kit Kit is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,716
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiterunner View Post
It's not DNA being used to solve crime that bothers me about GEDMatch either, but the fact that anyone who knows the email address of a member, or their ID number or kit number, can access their DNA results, and it is easy to imagine bots being used to trawl the site gathering data by trying different kit numbers.
I've read something else recently where some researchers released a paper showing how easy it was to upload falsified DNA to a website to gain information ie they want to find out who has a certain gene mutation so they can modify and upload and then all matches they get have that mutation, or disease etc.

They only accessed publicly available DNA and I can't remember where that was but it would be easily for others to upload to GEDmatch or other sites to gain what they wanted to know.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janet View Post
I agree, Kite, and I'm sure if that's the case they're already trying it out.

Today's NY Times has some more of the details.
Your DNA Profile is Private? A Florida Judge Just Said Otherwise



Thanks for posting, Toni. Did you mean the detective is now looking to access other databases?
Sorry, typo. Yes the detective is now looking to access other databases.

Phoenix DNA testing from birth is terrifying from the insurance point of view. I can see them denying coverage for people because they have a particular gene.

I've had genetic testing for medical purposes years ago so my dna is out there somewhere. I don't even know what lab was used.

I guess my issue with crime enforcement taking DNA samples is that they are accessing things without the person's permission. It isn't like they could go and DNA test a million random people to catch a criminal so why should they be able to access the genealogical databases. I also think that if they do get access it should be limited to first, maybe second cousins, and closer.
__________________
Toni
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-11-19, 14:02
Olde Crone Olde Crone is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,767
Default

But you only need one dna hit with a name to be able to construct a tree in the old fashioned way. I see it as just another forensic tool. If you put any kind of information into the hands of a third party, you have lost control of what happens to it.

OC
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-11-19, 14:48
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,617
Default

Sib's child is my grandparents' only great grandchild, and shows no sign of wishing to procreate. My family is disappearing up its own backside, so I am not unduly concerned about handing over fossil DNA.

If I had children and grandchildren I would think very carefully about providing DNA. Once that genii is out of the bottle, you have no guarantee as to what happens to it.
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-11-19, 09:23
Kit's Avatar
Kit Kit is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,716
Default

I have no idea what country this article originated in but there are talks of DNA testing all new born children so their possible medical future can be assessed. If that happened there would be no privacy at all. I also can't get past the impact it would have on insurance, little children denied coverage as they carry a gene for some disease that may or may not actually occur.
__________________
Toni
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-11-19, 10:20
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,617
Default

In this country, you cannot get insurance with standard terms if you have a known condition. If the technology is available, the insurance company would demand you be tested before they would grant insurance.

I don't think we can backwards on this, but earlier testing may result in better therapies. That is the message being given, though I suspect there will be many unforeseen consequences.
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:13.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.