#1
|
|||
|
|||
Miriam Johnson (OH's FFMM)
Name - "official" name and what they were known as:
Miriam Johnson Date and place of birth; 1839 Bramley, Surrey from census though birth registered in Petworth district, Sussex. Names of parents: William & Eliza Date and place of baptism - if applicable: 17 Nov 1839 Hascombe, Surrey Details of each of his or her marriages - if any: 11 Dec 1865 Wisborough Green, Sussex to Thomas Pottington. Occupation(s) - if any 1861: general servant for Mark Miram of Yew Tree House Wisborough Green, farmer of 20 acres Addresses where they lived (including county if in UK) - and please list which censuses you have or haven't found him/her on. 1841: Hascombe, Surrey 1851/61: Wisborough Green 1871/81: Lisgate Common, Fittleworth 1891: Hoghurst, Fittleworth 1901: Lower Mill, Fittleworth 1911: ??? only 3 people in the country called Pottington none of them are Miriam or her husband Entered as Knight as Elizabeth has discovered Date, place and cause of death: probably 1920, Petworth district Date and place of burial / cremation; n/k Details of will / administration of their estate - if applicable; none found Memorial inscription - if any: n/k Link to husband Thomas Pottington/Potterton or Knight Last edited by Jill; 23-11-12 at 18:15. Reason: typo plus Elizabeth's discovery |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Jill, this is odd!
Is there any reason they would have used another surname in 1911? It is just because I have found the following: KNIGHT, Thomas Head Married M 74 1837 Stone Quaryman Sussex Kirdford KNIGHT, Miriam Wife Married 45 years F 74 1837 Surrey Cranleigh RG number: RG14 Piece: 5298 Reference: RG14PN5298 RG78PN236 RD82 SD2 ED7 SN23 Bognor Mill Fittleworth Compare this with 1901 Census: POTTINGTON, Thomas Head Married M 67 1834 Stone Quarryman Kirdford Sussex POTTINGTON, Marian Wife Married F 66 1835 Bramley Surrey RG number: RG13 Piece: 954 Folio: 109 Page: 18 Lower Mill, Fittleworth, Little Bognor County: Sussex |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
If she was baptised in 1838 then she can't have been born in 1839!
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
All I can think is that because of their age etc someone else filled in the form incorrectly.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Oops Kiterunner that's my typo, baptism should read 17 Nov 1839, I'll amend it.
How bizarre about the name Knight, Elizabeth, thanks for finding that I shall have to ask my bro in law if he knows any more as he has done a lot more work on the family than I have. Last edited by Jill; 18-09-10 at 20:03. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Curioser & curioser.
Just stumped up for their 1911 entry, and that of their son Frank Pottington in a separate household who is also down as Frank Knight! Frank married in 1901 as Pottington and had a daughter Mary Lottie b1907 born as Pottington. All very odd. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I thought it might be Thomas and Miriam when I saw the 1911 transcription, but even odder with their son Frank!
I wonder what would prompt them to change their name? Is it just they preferred Knight or was there a reason to change identity - although I can't believe that as they are living in the same area surrounded by people who know them. I'd be interested to hear what your brother-in-law says, Jill. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
BTW - our wedding reception was at Bramley, Surrey!
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Frank and his wife might have had another child, later on:
Sep qr 1920 Knight Irene Mother's Maiden name: Goacher Petworth 2b 629 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Miriam & Thomas's son in law Charles Harwood, farm bailiff had started stealing from his employer merchant banker Sir Ernest Drake Kleinwort in Haywards Heath near the time of the census (May, Jun & Oct, sums of 2 shillings) but no charges were brought until December so it can't have been that.
update: saw bro in law today and asked, he said Thomas's father though known as Pottington was illegitimate and had been born as Knight, so the family used both names. Last edited by Jill; 19-09-10 at 11:41. Reason: the answer |
Tags |
to2g27 |
|
|