#1
|
||||
|
||||
I've never seen this before on a census
https://www.ancestry.co.uk/interacti...=successSource
The ages are in years and months, the time married is also in years and month and it lists the youngest child as born 1st April 1911.
__________________
Marg |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
But presumably "grandfather" and "grandmother" should be "father-in-law" and "mother-in-law"?
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Yes I presume so. Didn’t look into it as it’s the in-laws and I was looking at the Oldbury name
__________________
Marg |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
I can go one better than that, ages followed by day & month of birth.
https://www.ancestry.co.uk/interacti...&usePUBJs=true They also record a son who has passed away, although I know this isn't uncommon.
__________________
Jay |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
I suppose they started with the baby "under 1 month" and just applied the principle to everyone else.
Interesting that nobody has moved the children of the marriage to the correct line, or chased for that information on the Smarts.
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Yes I’ve seen deceased children listed
__________________
Marg |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I love details census, especially when they list any deceased children. I hate recording a child as unknown, dead before 1911, although it is better than not being counted at all.
__________________
Toni |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
On my ex's tree I found on 1911 census a list of children that made no sense till I realised the children were all dead. Several boys and girls with the same names who died under the age of 5. So sad, but at least they are recorded.
__________________
Love from Nell researching Chowns in Buckinghamshire & Oxfordshire Brewer, Broad, Eplett & Pope in Cornwall Smoothy & Willsher/Wiltshire in Essex & Surrey Emms, Mealing + variants, Purvey & Williams in Gloucestershire Barnes, Dunt, Gray, Massingham, Saul/Seals/Sales in Norfolk Matthews & Nash in Warwickshire |
|
|