Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Research Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 27-12-18, 08:59
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,646
Default Walter James, Walter and Albert

GRO.GOV.UK gives

Walter James
MASON, WALTER JAMES GIFFORD
GRO Reference: 1866 M Quarter in LAMBETH Volume 01D Page 360

Albert (and John, who appears to be a twin)
MASON, ALBERT GIFFARD
GRO Reference: 1870 D Quarter in WANDSWORTH Volume 01D Page 534
MASON, JOHN GIFFARD
GRO Reference: 1870 D Quarter in WANDSWORTH Volume 01D Page 534

1871 census gives:
Walter Mason 3 b Kennington
John Mason 7 Months b Battersea

Okay so far, except that Walter has lost a couple of years and Albert would appear to have died at birth.

Then crisis struck. The parents, Thomas and Clara split up. Thomas went off with his fancy woman. Clara, in poor health, ended up in the workhouse.

The boys were admitted 23 August 1877:
https://www.ancestry.co.uk/interacti...6_189889-00570


Albert b 1868
John b 1870


So... I assume that Albert (the twin) died at birth, Walter was renamed after him.


The boys were discharged in 1884. John lodged with a brother in 1891. But can anyone see what happened to Walter/Albert? (In the workhouse, their place of birth is given as Lambeth)
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 27-12-18, 09:09
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,301
Default

Hmm, there is a Walter James Mason death Apr-Jun 1868 Lambeth, age 2.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 27-12-18, 09:21
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,646
Default

I know, Kite. And no death of an Albert in 1870/71.

It is possible that Walter aged 3 on the 1871 is not recorded in civil registration. If Clara was going through a bad period in her life, she might not have got round to it.

The death of her daughter Clara Ada was recorded in 1867.
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 27-12-18, 10:21
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,646
Default

That link shows the boys being discharged - but presumably just to see their mother. They then bounced in and out:

https://www.ancestry.co.uk/interacti...6_189889-00574
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27-12-18, 13:49
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,301
Default

I wonder whether Albert's birth reg was a late registration.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 27-12-18, 16:12
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,646
Default

I did think of that, Kite. But they would have to lie about year of birth. As the two entries are on the same page, I assume they would have to have pretended that the boys were twins, otherwise there would have been fines for late registration and a hand-written entry in the right place.
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:03.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.