#11
|
||||
|
||||
I find it slightly alarming that I've got a thru lines link with someone whose tree is locked and private, showing the exact relationship.
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Isn't locked the same as private?
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Where matches have a greyed out, locked tree, you can't see any information in the ordinary way. This is showing exactly what the relationship is. In this case it is through female lines. Were it male, you might be able to work out the name of the relation.
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
I guess if the other person wanted to avoid that happening, they just wouldn't link their DNA test to the tree.
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
It's why my own tree isn't linked. But I think it much more likely that they don't know.
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
It is private but searchable, in that it would appear in a search marked as private. They have the option to make it private AND unsearchable and you should then not be able to find it.
__________________
Toni |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Just do it. Her tree will already appear in other people's thrulines if there is a match. Selecting it is only if you want to see the thrulines.
__________________
Toni |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Oh joy. A rare surname means there is a link between two families - but probably a couple of generations further back. Other trees are comprehensively f**ked, so I presumably cannot steer them back to the straight and narrow.
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
I have read somewhere on FB that people consistently complained about individual thrulines being incorrect and they were eventually removed. You could try that and see what happens.
__________________
Toni |
|
|