Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Family History General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 22-08-22, 01:45
Kit's Avatar
Kit Kit is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,716
Default Capital or no?

Is it Newcastle Under Lyme or Newcastle under Lyme?

While there is a discussion (hopefully) going on should it be hypenated?
ie Newcastle-U/under-Lyme or not?

Every time I see something it seems to be different to the time before and I have no idea which is correct or is this some weird English thing to keep us Aussies in the dark?
__________________
Toni
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22-08-22, 05:16
maggie_4_7
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I write Newcastle-under-Lyme which I believe is the correct spelling, Newcastle and Lyme being names.

Last edited by maggie_4_7; 22-08-22 at 05:19.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 22-08-22, 08:10
Kit's Avatar
Kit Kit is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,716
Default

I like that Maggie and it is what I prefer but occasionally Under is used and it confuses me. Same as the hyphens. Sometimes they are used and sometimes not.

Stoke on Trent and Stoke upon Trent I've worked out are 2 separate things.

Now I'm working on Yorkshire West Riding, Yorkshire (West Riding) and West Yorkshire.
__________________
Toni
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 22-08-22, 08:54
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,321
Default

I don't know what you mean about Stoke on Trent and Stoke upon Trent being 2 separate things, Toni? They are both names for the same place.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 21st May
Lancashire Non-conformist records new on Ancestry
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 22-08-22, 10:08
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,688
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kit View Post

Now I'm working on Yorkshire West Riding, Yorkshire (West Riding) and West Yorkshire.
I'm not good at geography but West Yorkshire is a modern administrative area and not the same as the West Riding. There now appears to be a South Yorkshire, which didn't exist in the past.
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 23-08-22, 07:22
scuda scuda is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 172
Default

From http://www.thepotteries.org/location/stoke/stoke.html

"Notice that the town is correctly called Stoke-upon-Trent, as distinct from the city, which is Stoke-on-Trent. In practice, local people know the town of Stoke-upon-Trent by the simpler and shorter name of Stoke."

So, similar but different.

scuda
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 23-08-22, 08:19
Merry's Avatar
Merry Merry is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Christchurch, Dorset
Posts: 21,357
Default

scuda - that's interesting - I'd not realised that before.

All these places that include the name of the river they lie by, but are commonly shortened to just the first word, such as Stoke, Newcastle, Stratford etc - I want to know why Kingston upon Hull is called Hull and not Kingston?
__________________
Merry

"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 24-08-22, 13:49
vita vita is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,025
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiterunner View Post
I don't know what you mean about Stoke on Trent and Stoke upon Trent being 2 separate things, Toni? They are both names for the same place.
Would have agreed with you,Kite until I read Scuda's post. Well, you live & learn.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 25-08-22, 03:32
Kit's Avatar
Kit Kit is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,716
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scuda View Post
From http://www.thepotteries.org/location/stoke/stoke.html

"Notice that the town is correctly called Stoke-upon-Trent, as distinct from the city, which is Stoke-on-Trent. In practice, local people know the town of Stoke-upon-Trent by the simpler and shorter name of Stoke."

So, similar but different.

scuda
Thanks for posting.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vita View Post
Would have agreed with you,Kite until I read Scuda's post. Well, you live & learn.
I thought the same as Kite and vita too, until I read either scuda's page above, or something similar. I had figured it was just a name change.

I am going to have to go through all my Stoke places to make sure I have my upons and ons correct.
__________________
Toni
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 25-08-22, 03:33
Kit's Avatar
Kit Kit is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,716
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Merry View Post
scuda - that's interesting - I'd not realised that before.

All these places that include the name of the river they lie by, but are commonly shortened to just the first word, such as Stoke, Newcastle, Stratford etc - I want to know why Kingston upon Hull is called Hull and not Kingston?
There is always an exception to the rule.
__________________
Toni
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:07.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.