Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere!



Go Back   Genealogists' Forum - We have branches everywhere! > Research > Research Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 14-09-23, 22:49
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,649
Default

I agree,Merry. If someone married in 1889, why would you assume the husband was dead by 1892? Unless, I suppose, she was a credible witness, and he wasn't?
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 15-09-23, 07:53
Olde Crone Olde Crone is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,823
Default

Hmmm. I'm not sure it would be all that difficult for Hugh to obtain her first marriage certificate. Twenty years ago, I was able to at least discount various certificates merely by engaging the interest of the registrar, haha. A hundred years earlier, I bet it would have been even easier, if he presented himself as a possible victim of bigamy.

Having said that, I think it's just as likely that the registrar found a certificate that looked right, but wasn't! I think the court didn't take it seriously - if they did, then Emily would have been charged with bigamy.

OC
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 15-09-23, 09:38
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,649
Default

I've been through all the Emilys born Surrey per Ancestry in 1891. Unfortunately, Sussex can look like Surrey and I need a break before going through the Sussex ones.

If you were out of area and truthful, you might well say you were born in Guildford or possibly Leatherhead. Checking those, and the ones that just said Surrey, none cross referenced to marriages on FreeBMD.

One woman who gave West Horsley as a birthplace appears to have grown up in Stoke, which is the other side of Guildford.

The trouble is, if you are a servant or a lodger, nobody is really interested in the accuracy of the information.
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 15-09-23, 09:59
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,301
Default

Thanks, Phoenix.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 15-09-23, 10:10
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix Phoenix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,649
Default

Emily didn't marry in Chichester, Willesdon, Lambeth or Edmonton, unless she was lying like mad. Either the fathers' names are wrong and Robinson witnesses are not immediate family, and/or the wife is on the next census with a family.
__________________
The chestnuts cast their flambeaux
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 15-09-23, 16:35
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,301
Default

Thanks. I've gone through the Emily Robinson (with no middle name) marriages in 1889 on FreeBMD and the only one I haven't managed to rule out is to George Fox in Glanford Brigg district but I should think that one is unlikely being so far away.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 15-09-23, 19:46
Merry's Avatar
Merry Merry is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Near Christchurch, Dorset
Posts: 21,310
Default

So either Hugh was telling porkies or the year printed in the paper was wrong?
__________________
Merry

"Something has been filled in that I didn't know was blank" Matthew Broderick WDYTYA? March 2010
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 15-09-23, 21:46
kiterunner's Avatar
kiterunner kiterunner is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 25,301
Default

I suppose so.
__________________
KiteRunner

Family History News updated 29th Feb
Findmypast 1871 census update
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 16:02.


Hosted by Photon IT

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 PL3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.